> On 20.09.2005 22:00, Joe Rhett wrote:
> >So tell me, why exactly should LabelFormat control whether or not a tape is
> >recycled? The error is this:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:13:21AM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> It might if it is a bug. From your description, that's what I think
> might be p
Hi,
On 20.09.2005 22:00, Joe Rhett wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Why don't you simple comment out the "Label Format" directive, and see
if that corrects the behaviour. If it does, file a bug report telling
that the manual needs an update or the DIR behav
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 04:08:03PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> This may be a silly question, especially since I don't know which
> version you're running, but have you executed an 'Update Pools' command
> since you changed the pool definition? I don't remember which was the
> first release in
Joe Rhett wrote:
>>On 18.09.2005 07:12, Joe Rhett wrote:
>>
>>>Before I go to all of that trouble, could someone kindly look at the
>>>configuration I posted and tell me what is missing? I'm fairly certain
>>>that it is a configuration problem. I doubt that so many people using it
>>>wouldn't hav
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Why don't you simple comment out the "Label Format" directive, and see
> if that corrects the behaviour. If it does, file a bug report telling
> that the manual needs an update or the DIR behaviour should be changed.
>
> That's basi
> On 18.09.2005 07:12, Joe Rhett wrote:
> >Before I go to all of that trouble, could someone kindly look at the
> >configuration I posted and tell me what is missing? I'm fairly certain
> >that it is a configuration problem. I doubt that so many people using it
> >wouldn't have found this problem
Joe,
On 18.09.2005 07:12, Joe Rhett wrote:
...
Before I go to all of that trouble, could someone kindly look at the
configuration I posted and tell me what is missing? I'm fairly certain
that it is a configuration problem. I doubt that so many people using it
wouldn't have found this problem
> On 17.09.2005 08:49, Joe Rhett wrote:
> >Alright people, I seriously need an explanation here.
> >
> >You have X volumes, which are each retained for Y retention time.
> >You can add another volume by labelling it.
> >
> >If no free volume is available, and Recycle is enabled, Bacula should
> >re
Hello,
On 17.09.2005 08:49, Joe Rhett wrote:
Alright people, I seriously need an explanation here.
You have X volumes, which are each retained for Y retention time.
You can add another volume by labelling it.
If no free volume is available, and Recycle is enabled, Bacula should
recycle the ol
