Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Robert Nelson
users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery --On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 06:50 -0800 Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep Microsoft is so obviously at fault here. First of all they designed > FAT in the late

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Nelson wrote: > Yet more disinformation, Microsoft hasn't released a desktop OS in more than > 7 years that required FAT or even selected it as the default on new > installations. > > Yes all Microsoft Operating Systems still support FAT as do

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Robert Nelson
mber 08, 2006 8:30 AM To: Robert Nelson Cc: 'Georg Altmann'; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Robert Nelson wrote: > Yet more disinformation, Microsoft hasn't released a desktop OS in more than &g

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Robert Nelson wrote: > Yet more disinformation, Microsoft hasn't released a desktop OS in more than > 7 years that required FAT or even selected it as the default on new > installations. FAT32 is STILL the standard shipped filesystem on most laptops, prebuilt desktops and ext

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Georg Altmann
--On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 08:08 -0800 Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yet more disinformation, Microsoft hasn't released a desktop OS in more > than 7 years that required FAT or even selected it as the default on new > installations. Wow, great more than seven years, you mean l

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Georg Altmann
--On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 06:50 -0800 Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep Microsoft is so obviously at fault here. First of all they designed > FAT in the late 70s. Shame on them for using a filesystem design similar > to all the other systems at the time. Then to top it off

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Robert Nelson
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Brown Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 6:16 AM To: Georg Altmann Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Georg Altmann wrote: > Unfortunately nice people from Redmond ca

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why not just format it to something else? Georg Altmann wrote: > > --On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 14:16 + Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Georg Altmann wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately nice people from Redmond can ge

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Georg Altmann
--On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 14:16 + Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Georg Altmann wrote: > >> Unfortunately nice people from Redmond can get in your way here. > > understatement :-) >> I >> attached the FireWire disk to my desktop, booted Windows XP > > N

Re: [Bacula-users] Off-topic: FAT32 disaster recovery

2006-12-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Georg Altmann wrote: > Unfortunately nice people from Redmond can get in your way here. understatement > I > attached the FireWire disk to my desktop, booted Windows XP Now you know why you should NEVER use MS products and operating systems to recover corrupted MS file