Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 19 August 2005 12:00, Kern Sibbald wrote: ... > > If I am not mistaken, bconsole or gnome-console has some form of rc file > where these can be put. ... In looking at the bconsole code, I see that when bconsole starts, it looks in the user's $HOME directory for a .bconsolerc, and if fou

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Yes, this is nice. This is the kind of approach that I would like to encourage for those who need it. Also after thinking about it a bit more, I'm convinced that as a base installation (i.e. my Makefiles), the daemons and the interface programs are all system administration tools. They can be

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 19 August 2005 02:04, Chris Lee wrote: > I agree with Jesse that this is almost a packaging issue. However, I do > think that certain files should be moved. > > Specifically: > All daemons should go in "$(sbindir)". > The sd tools, bconsole, and any other gui console or monitoring progra

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005, Jesse Keating wrote: > > [...] > > However one thing that _has_ > > bothered me is that when running bconsole, it does not by default look > > at /etc/bacula/ for a bconsole.conf file. So

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005, Jesse Keating wrote: [...] > However one thing that _has_ > bothered me is that when running bconsole, it does not by default look > at /etc/bacula/ for a bconsole.conf file. So when I run it I have to > manually point to the config f

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-19 Thread Davide Bolcioni
Kern Sibbald wrote: Are there any comments on this proposal? To be consistent, I would imagine we would need to include bconsole, wxconsole, and possibly a number of other files in /usr/bin as well. I can understand Daniel's point, but probably prefer to let the user move or link the file t

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-18 Thread Landon Fuller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Lee wrote: | Switching gears for a moment... | Jesse also brought up another subject which has occurred to me as well. For | the daemons I completely agree with keeping the config files in /etc/bacula | but for console and gui programs it makes

RE: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-18 Thread Chris Lee
I agree with Jesse that this is almost a packaging issue. However, I do think that certain files should be moved. Specifically: All daemons should go in "$(sbindir)". The sd tools, bconsole, and any other gui console or monitoring program should go in "$(bindir)". The bsmtp tool, the mtx-changer

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: [Bacula-devel] Proposal for location of gnome-console

2005-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 17:59 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Are there any comments on this proposal? > > To be consistent, I would imagine we would need to include bconsole, > wxconsole, and possibly a number of other files in /usr/bin as well. I can > understand Daniel's point, but probably pr