On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 09:52 +0300, MaxxAtWork wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't have any opinion on the brand choice but I would
> suggest you to check not only the h/w specs but also
> if there is any support/warranty bonus included in the price,
> and how easy would be to receive assistance for repairs, e
On 10/12/06, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the justification in HP's higher price (Ultrium 448) over Quantum's
> LTO-2 drive?
>
> Is there any other option I didn't consider?
>
Hi,
I don't have any opinion on the brand choice but I would
suggest you to check not only the h/w specs but also
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 22:04 +0200, Gour wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:23 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
> > better solution.
>
> OK. It looks that almost everybody agrees on lto-2.
>
> Now the remaining question is
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:23 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
> better solution.
OK. It looks that almost everybody agrees on lto-2.
Now the remaining question is whether is Quantum LTO-2 HH better (I know
it is quite cheaper
Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
better solution.
dlt components may have cheaper list prices, but cheaper is not always
less expensive or a better value. I would compare the situation to a
fast two-seat sports car and a school bus. If I have 10 kids and
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:38 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
> > Is there any advantage of dlt over lto-2 ?
> Yes:
> - capacity
> - speed
> - technological lifespan (newer, so will probably be around after dlt is
> gone)
> - durability (drive match data rate so drives and media have a longer
> lifespa
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 18:00 +0200, Gour wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:28 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
>
> > lto is faster to backup and restore. The drives change speed to match
> > the data transfer rate, which will extend the life of both the drives
> > and the media.
>
> Oh, I didn't kno
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:28 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
> lto is faster to backup and restore. The drives change speed to match
> the data transfer rate, which will extend the life of both the drives
> and the media.
Oh, I didn't know that.
> The lto media has higher capacity, and cost per da
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 08:51 -0700, Quinton Jansen wrote:
> I'd stay away from the adaptec cards (especially if they mention RAID in
> their
> specs). There is an incompatibility with tape drives and the raid (even if
> turned off), which leads to a huge performance hit (i.e. write speeds way
I use lto2 (daily) and 3 (weekly), with hp960 external and msl6030 with
2 hp960 drives. I previously used a hp 6/60 dlt4 library with 5
drives.
lto is faster to backup and restore. The drives change speed to match
the data transfer rate, which will extend the life of both the drives
and the me
10 matches
Mail list logo
