Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the better solution.
dlt components may have cheaper list prices, but cheaper is not always less expensive or a better value. I would compare the situation to a fast two-seat sports car and a school bus. If I have 10 kids and a nominal income, the bus is the better value. On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 20:45 +0200, Gour wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:38 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote: > > > > Is there any advantage of dlt over lto-2 ? > > > Yes: > > - capacity > > - speed > > - technological lifespan (newer, so will probably be around after dlt is > > gone) > > - durability (drive match data rate so drives and media have a longer > > lifespan > > > > So, those are advantages of lto-w2 over dlt, i.e. lto-2 looks as a > better solution... > > Sincerely, > Gour > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
