On Wednesday 21 June 2006 20:36, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 6/21/2006 11:21 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Friday 16 June 2006 21:06, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>Interesting option... but please provide us with a good API for all
> >>sorts of status changes of jobs, volumes, and the
Hello,
On 6/21/2006 11:21 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 21:06, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
>>Interesting option... but please provide us with a good API for all
>>sorts of status changes of jobs, volumes, and the catalog itself :-)
>
>
> Why don't we start by implementing a number
On Friday 16 June 2006 21:06, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/13/2006 12:01 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 21:50, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>My personal preference would be the proliferation of directives... but
> >>then, I do get paid by people who don't want to work
Hi,
On 6/13/2006 12:01 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 21:50, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
>>My personal preference would be the proliferation of directives... but
>>then, I do get paid by people who don't want to work through the
>>configuration themselves ;-)
>
>
> Yea, but you see
On Monday 12 June 2006 21:50, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 6/12/2006 3:34 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 14:29, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> >>On 6/8/2006 10:08 AM, Chris Crowther wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>Admittedly, the best solution would be 'Full Backup Storage=',
> >>'Differenti
Hello,
On 6/12/2006 3:34 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 14:29, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>On 6/8/2006 10:08 AM, Chris Crowther wrote:
...
>>Admittedly, the best solution would be 'Full Backup Storage=',
>>'Differential Backup storage=' and 'Incremental Backup Storage='
>>directives in
On Monday 12 June 2006 14:29, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/8/2006 10:08 AM, Chris Crowther wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I seem to have run across a problem when storing Full and
> > Differential backups on tape and Incrementals on disk, when combined
> > with re-running missed levels.
>
> Ah ye
On Thursday 08 June 2006 10:08, Chris Crowther wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I seem to have run across a problem when storing Full and
> Differential backups on tape and Incrementals on disk, when combined
> with re-running missed levels.
>
> If Bacula upgrades the job to either Full or Differential from an
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Yes and yes ;-)
> Depending on what you want.
It to work properly ;)
> Admittedly, the best solution would be 'Full Backup Storage=',
> 'Differential Backup storage=' and 'Incremental Backup Storage='
> directives in the job resource.
Strangely enough I was sat there thi
Hi,
On 6/8/2006 10:08 AM, Chris Crowther wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I seem to have run across a problem when storing Full and
> Differential backups on tape and Incrementals on disk, when combined
> with re-running missed levels.
Ah yes. I knew what you was aiming at at this point :-(
> If Bacula upg
10 matches
Mail list logo
