Hello Kern,
2015-01-25 11:56 GMT+01:00 Kern Sibbald :
> On 23.01.2015 19:22, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2015-01-22 3:42 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk :
>
>> On 01/21/2015 06:41 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>>
>> > Bacula has a hard-coded 6 day limit on a job's run time. 518401
>> secon
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] how to debug a job
> From: Roberts, Ben
> To: Kern Sibbald
> Cc: bacula-users
> Date: Mon Jan 26 2015 02:51:10 GMT-0500 (EST)
>
>
> Hi Kern,
>
> >> Hard-coded, huh? Nobody's tried backing up that b
sibbald.com]
Sent: 25 January 2015 10:56
To: Radosław Korzeniewski; Dimitri Maziuk
Cc: bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] how to debug a job
On 23.01.2015 19:22, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
2015-01-22 3:42 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk
mailto:dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu>>:
On 01/21/2015 06:4
On 1/24/2015 1:12 PM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 1/24/2015 9:00 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> Bottom line: contrary to what I previously thought there *might* be some
>> benefits to turning on spooling for disk Volumes, but only if you have
>> really fast spooling disks (or SSD). This is an interes
On 23.01.2015 19:22, Radosław
Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
2015-01-22 3:42 GMT+01:00 Dimitri
Maziuk :
On 01/21/2015 06:41 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> Bacula has a hard-co
On 1/24/2015 9:00 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Bottom line: contrary to what I previously thought there *might* be some
> benefits to turning on spooling for disk Volumes, but only if you have
> really fast spooling disks (or SSD). This is an interesting topic, and
> it would be nice to see some rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
This is not directed to any particular individual person -- I just
chose the last email on this topic to keep the thread.
I have alway thought it would not be useful to use spooling when
writ
Hello,
2015-01-23 21:36 GMT+01:00 Josh Fisher :
>
> On 1/23/2015 2:33 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> >> On 01/23/2015 12:22 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> >>
> >>> If you are using a vchanger then I guess it is a disk only backup, so
> why
> >>> do you spool data? It is not required but making you
Hello,
2015-01-23 21:42 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk :
> On 01/23/2015 02:33 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> > No, it is not working as you described.
> > Data spooling will read stream from the client, then write it to the
> > temporary disk file, then during despool it is stopping a stream fro
Hello,
2015-01-23 20:57 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk :
> On 01/23/2015 01:33 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
>
> > Even though, IMHO, spooling disks backup is just "muda" (Japanese Term):
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muda_(Japanese_term)
>
> so are proxies and caching: spool disk is just a variation on
>
On 01/23/2015 02:33 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> No, it is not working as you described.
> Data spooling will read stream from the client, then write it to the
> temporary disk file, then during despool it is stopping a stream from the
> client, reads a temporary file and write to destinatio
On 1/23/2015 2:33 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
>> On 01/23/2015 12:22 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>>
>>> If you are using a vchanger then I guess it is a disk only backup, so why
>>> do you spool data? It is not required but making you backup slow down at
>>> least 2 times then standard job.
>> It
Hello,
2015-01-23 20:04 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk :
> On 01/23/2015 12:22 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> > If you are using a vchanger then I guess it is a disk only backup, so why
> > do you spool data? It is not required but making you backup slow down at
> > least 2 times then standard jo
> Even though, IMHO, spooling disks backup is just "muda" (Japanese
> Term): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muda_(Japanese_term)
Not necessarily - if you have a number of backups that tend to flake out
halfway through for whatever reasons (network, client issues, user
issues, etc) e.g. then by spoo
On 01/23/2015 01:33 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Even though, IMHO, spooling disks backup is just "muda" (Japanese Term):
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muda_(Japanese_term)
so are proxies and caching: spool disk is just a variation on
that theme.
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResB
> On 01/23/2015 12:22 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> > If you are using a vchanger then I guess it is a disk only backup, so why
> > do you spool data? It is not required but making you backup slow down at
> > least 2 times then standard job.
>
> It's 2 times slower if your spool/despool is
On 01/23/2015 12:22 PM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> If you are using a vchanger then I guess it is a disk only backup, so why
> do you spool data? It is not required but making you backup slow down at
> least 2 times then standard job.
It's 2 times slower if your spool/despool is strictly sequ
Hello,
2015-01-22 3:42 GMT+01:00 Dimitri Maziuk :
> On 01/21/2015 06:41 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>
> > Bacula has a hard-coded 6 day limit on a job's run time. 518401
> seconds =
> > 6.1157 days, so it appears that is the cause for the watchdog
> killing the job.
>
> Hard-coded, huh? Nobody
On 01/23/2015 09:57 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> ... Have you been able to determine what
> exactly is slow? I wonder if when the data spool file gets full it
> triggers a de-spool of both data and attributes, rather than just data?
Look like there's something wrong with the spool disk: I replaced it
On 1/23/2015 10:36 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
On 1/23/2015 9:03 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
I use another approach. I define the vchanger to have multiple
virtual drives... So for 10 concurrent jobs there would be 10 virtual
drives and so 10 opened volume files.
My way also keeps the config simple s
On 1/23/2015 9:03 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> I use another approach. I define the vchanger to have multiple virtual
> drives... So for 10 concurrent jobs there would be 10 virtual
> drives and so 10 opened volume files.
My way also keeps the config simple stupid: as long as the backups
complete on
On 1/22/2015 12:47 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 01/22/2015 10:07 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
There is likely no reason to have SpoolData=yes for disk volumes, and it
could actually slow things down.
On 01/22/2015 07:32 AM, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
Spooling is for the benefit of tape drives and
On 01/22/2015 10:07 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> There is likely no reason to have SpoolData=yes for disk volumes, and it
> could actually slow things down.
On 01/22/2015 07:32 AM, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
> Spooling is for the benefit of tape drives and databases. What is the
> benefit of spoolin
On 1/21/2015 6:37 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 01/21/2015 05:12 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
Hey Mr. Dimitri: do you have Attribute Spooling on for this job (Job
resource, Spool Attributes=yes)? It usually improves the performance if
backing up lots of files, witch maybe causing this bottleneck.
I back up over 300T each month. For that reason I also stay as current as
is reasonably possible on versions of Bacula. Having upgraded to version
7, I've found that the 6-day hard coded failure appears to have been
removed which has allowed several of my long-running jobs to complete
successfull
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] how to debug a job
(Take 2)
I've a client with ~316GB to back up. Currently the backup's been
running for 5 days and wrote 33GB to the spool file. Previous runs
failed with
> User specified Job spool size reached: JobSpoolSize=49,807,365,050
On 01/21/2015 06:41 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> Bacula has a hard-coded 6 day limit on a job's run time. 518401 seconds =
> 6.1157 days, so it appears that is the cause for the watchdog killing the
> job.
Hard-coded, huh? Nobody's tried backing up that big data I keep hearing
about?
> Does
On 01/21/2015 05:13 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> (Take 2)
>
> I've a client with ~316GB to back up. Currently the backup's been
> running for 5 days and wrote 33GB to the spool file. Previous runs
> failed with
>
>> User specified Job spool size reached: JobSpoolSize=49,807,365,050
>> MaxJobSpool
On 01/21/2015 05:12 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hey Mr. Dimitri: do you have Attribute Spooling on for this job (Job
resource, Spool Attributes=yes)? It usually improves the performance if
backing up lots of files, witch maybe causing this bottleneck.
Yes:
SpoolData = yes
SpoolAttributes =
> I've a client with ~316GB to back up. Currently the backup's been
> running for 5 days and wrote 33GB to the spool file. Previous runs
> failed with
>
> > User specified Job spool size reached: JobSpoolSize=49,807,365,050
> > MaxJobSpoolSize=49,807,360,000
> > Writing spooled data to Volume. Des
(Take 2)
I've a client with ~316GB to back up. Currently the backup's been
running for 5 days and wrote 33GB to the spool file. Previous runs
failed with
> User specified Job spool size reached: JobSpoolSize=49,807,365,050
> MaxJobSpoolSize=49,807,360,000
> Writing spooled data to Volume. Despoo
31 matches
Mail list logo