ahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Julian,
Sadly, I have been bitten by the static/dynamically linked technicality. What I
want to do is compile bacula-fd on a test machine and copy the binary over to
the production machine and run it. Problem is, the fd com
No problem
Von: mehma sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. März 2009 01:34
An: Fahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Got it compiled ... THANKS!
Yudhvir
===
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote:
I usually
me (maybe
> on the weekend).
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> *Von:* mehma sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 3. März 2009 00:56
> *An:* Fahrer, Julian
> *Betreff:* Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
&
ahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
I am looking for a bacula-fd binary for a sparc Solaris 10. If you have a
compiled version, and don't mind parting with a copy...
Yudhvir
===
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote:
Hi,
I am running bacu
Brian Debelius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
> and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
> to run and be stable. So..
> Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run reliably once compiled?
Yes, I'm using bacula on S
Are you speaking of Solaris binaries or Linux binaries? I have not seen
any Solaris packages. I saw Bacula v2.2.8 on Blastwave a few minutes ago.
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Do you have some reason you need to compile it as opposed to using
> b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blastwave is what I was referring to. I'm a little surprised they
haven't gone past 2.2.8, but that's the latest I feel like running
anyway (2.4.x seemed to be a little problematic for awhile there and
things are running fine as-is).
=R
Brian Debeliu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you have some reason you need to compile it as opposed to using
binary packages that are provided? I switched from the former to the
latter (albeit on Solaris 9 for my director/storage daemon), but because
it was easier, not because it didn't work (
2009 17:27
An: bacula-users
Betreff: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Hi,
I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
to run and be stable. So..
Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run rel
Hi,
I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
to run and be stable. So..
Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run reliably once compiled?
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Those packages are fine -- I use them on many machines. What are the
extra dependencies that concern you? I think the client only has
dependencies on openssl and zlib, no?
Peter Buschman wrote:
> Hi Tanveer:
>
> I am working on pkgadd packages for So
Hi Tanveer:
I am working on pkgadd packages for Solaris 10 (sparc) that should
have minimal dependencies. In the meantime, Nickus Sodergard has put
up an excelllent guide on getting Bacula running using the freeware
packages from blastwave.com:
http://aspiringsysadmin.com/blog/2007/06/10/get
Is bacula require some packages as prereq. to work or install on solaris 10?
--
regards ,
Tanveer Haider Baig
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Sear
John wrote:
> Everything works fine on the linux boxes but the solaris boxes are showing
> these
> errors:
> Note: /data is an EMC storage array.
>
> ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /net
> ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend i
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, John wrote:
> Everything works fine on the linux boxes but the solaris boxes are showing
> these
> errors:
These are normal. Look for the onefs keyword in the manual.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influen
Everything works fine on the linux boxes but the solaris boxes are showing these
errors:
Note: /data is an EMC storage array.
ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /net
ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /home
ava-adbu1a-fd:
Am 11.05.2006 um 17:46 schrieb Waldock, Brian:
Before I go any further in building this environment, I wanted to
see if anyone has any experience with the following configuration
or similar.
Sun e480 running Solaris 10 OS
Sun storedge L180 fiber attached autochanger with 6 LTO2 fibre
you
make for your multi-drive environment? If you don’t mind me asking.
Thanks
Brian
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:29
PM
To: Waldock, Brian
Cc:
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] bacula
on solaris 10 with
uot;st" class="scsi"
target=4 lun=0;
name="st" class="scsi"
target=4 lun=1;
name="st" class="scsi"
target=5 lun=0;
name="st" class="scsi"
target=5 lun=1;
name="st" class="scsi"
target=6 lun=0;
name=&q
Hello Brian,
I have a Solaris 9 system on a SunFire
v240 running a Qualstar RLS8232 SCSI Attached with 2 LTO1 tape drives.
It is a little different – but similar
enough to demonstrate what needs to be done.
I edited the /kernel/drv/st.conf to make
sure the tape devices would get
Before I go any further in building this environment, I
wanted to see if anyone has any experience with the following configuration or
similar.
Sun e480 running Solaris 10 OS
Sun storedge L180 fiber attached autochanger with 6 LTO2 fibre
attached drives.
The 6 drives are connected t
21 matches
Mail list logo
