Re: [Bacula-users] Volume status error

2005-12-30 Thread Alejandro Alfonso
Hello! Is there a script or utility I can use to verify the backup on the tape? Does bacula support hardware compression? How well does it work generally? Generally its safe to use your database frontend to manage some tape values. And its really faster to change a hign number of rec

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume status error

2005-12-29 Thread Simon Gao
Is there a script or utility I can use to verify the backup on the tape? Does bacula support hardware compression? How well does it work generally? If I can recover files from the first volume, does it mean the volume and backup are ok? Simon Phil Stracchino wrote: Simon Gao wrote: Hi,

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume status error

2005-12-29 Thread Phil Stracchino
Simon Gao wrote: > Hi, > > Just started using Bacula and completed backup to the first volume. Now > backup moved to second volume. However, the volume status for the first > volume shows error. > Also the size of data put on the volume seems larger > than the spec (176G vs 160G). This is quite

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume status error

2005-12-29 Thread drescher0110-bacula
> Hi, > > Just started using Bacula and completed backup to > the first volume. Now > backup moved to second volume. However, the volume > status for the first > volume shows error. Also the size of data put on the > volume seems larger > than the spec (176G vs 160G). > I'd bet this is because

[Bacula-users] Volume status error

2005-12-29 Thread Simon Gao
Hi, Just started using Bacula and completed backup to the first volume. Now backup moved to second volume. However, the volume status for the first volume shows error. Also the size of data put on the volume seems larger than the spec (176G vs 160G). We are using Quantum SuperLoader 320 libr