On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:48 -0700, Steve Ellis wrote:
> On 8/5/2009 9:34 AM, Shawn wrote:
>
> > Yes, the problem is the "Hello command" which was introduced in 3.x
> >
> > On a 2.x director, it will simply state "Hello command rejected" as
> > the failure in connecting to the FD from the dir
On 8/5/2009 9:34 AM, Shawn wrote:
Yes, the problem is the "Hello command" which was introduced in 3.x
On a 2.x director, it will simply state "Hello command rejected" as
the failure in connecting to the FD from the director, I've tested
this before and go the same results regardless of the pla
Thanks,
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:54 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Shawn wrote:
>
> > > Has anyone looked into compiling a 64-bit v2.4 package?
>
> > Would that resolve this? I'm also trying the hotfix mentioned in another
> > response, will see if that does the
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Shawn wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into compiling a 64-bit v2.4 package?
> Would that resolve this? I'm also trying the hotfix mentioned in another
> response, will see if that does the trick first.
If these posts are to be believed, it might.
http://www.adsm.o
Would that resolve this? I'm also trying the hotfix mentioned in another
response, will see if that does the trick first.
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:29 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Hi John
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, John Drescher wrote:
>
> > > I'm pretty sure I had a problem doing that. Off t
Yes, the problem is the "Hello command" which was introduced in 3.x
On a 2.x director, it will simply state "Hello command rejected" as the
failure in connecting to the FD from the director, I've tested this
before and go the same results regardless of the platform (Mac OS X
PPC/Intel, Fedora 6 i3
Hi John
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, John Drescher wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure I had a problem doing that. Off the top of my head there's
> > some complaint about a hello not getting responded to properly. Possibly
> > the v3 bacula-fd doesn't like talking to a v2 bacula-sd, I'm not sure.
> >
> > I'd lo
>> I don't think it's recommended but I don't think you'll have any problems
>> installing a 3.0.2 fd and using it with a 2.4.4 dir+sd.
>
> I'm pretty sure I had a problem doing that. Off the top of my head there's
> some complaint about a hello not getting responded to properly. Possibly
> the v
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, James Harper wrote:
> > We're primarily a 95% linux desktop and server environment, with some
> > Macs, but we have a couple of pain in the necks we need to back up and I'm
> > concerned about VSS. One is a Windows Server 2008 64-bit, and another is
> > Vista 64-bit.
I don't know if this is your problem, but there is a bug in VSS for both
Vista and Windows 2008 that causes VSS to time out and fail. I don't
know what the symptom would be in bacula, but it's entirely possible
that you are seeing that. Check your event log for any related events.
The issue is
> Hello folk,
>
> We're primarily a 95% linux desktop and server environment, with some
> Macs, but we have a couple of pain in the necks we need to back up and I'm
> concerned about VSS. One is a Windows Server 2008 64-bit, and another is
> Vista 64-bit. Some things back up fine, but, I get
Hello folk,
We're primarily a 95% linux desktop and server environment, with
some Macs, but we have a couple of pain in the necks we need to back up
and I'm concerned about VSS. One is a Windows Server 2008 64-bit, and
another is Vista 64-bit. Some things back up fine, but, I get the
followi
12 matches
Mail list logo
