Thanks,
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:54 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Shawn wrote:
>
> > > Has anyone looked into compiling a 64-bit v2.4 package?
>
> > Would that resolve this? I'm also trying the hotfix mentioned in another
> > response, will see if that does the trick first.
>
> If these posts are to be believed, it might.
>
> http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00542.html
>
> http://www.nabble.com/VSS-failure-backing-up-Exchange-on-Windows-Server-2008-64bit-td18743108.html
> http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00552.html
>
> I'm really not qualified to say though. Apparently the reason v3 works is
> that there's a 64-bit build for win32 so if a 64-bit build of v2.4 for
> win32 were possible, one might hope it would work. I've no idea how much
> trouble that might be to achieve though.
>
> Gavin
>
Yep, I've hit those posts before.
Alright - since I don't see any winbacula 2.4.4 64-bit builds that
exist, it looks like my only options are to either compile 2.4.4 against
64-bit Vista/Win2k8, or upgrade the Director and the 64-bit clients to
3.0.2 - curious why there's still a package maintenance issue after
2.4.4 on Ubuntu/Fedora repos?
By the way, the hotfixes are a no-go on my version 2.4.4, but, I
think they would be acceptable "if" I had issues using 3.0.2 and not
2.4.4 - so, they're probably still useful, thank you kindly!
Shawn Q
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
