Re: [Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Jo Rhett
> > I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not > > followed. On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > No. They're not followed. > > If you check the archives, you'll see I started a conversation about this > where I suggested a new config value,

Re: [Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Bill Moran
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just went through all available releases of the manual, plus used google > to search the site, and I can't find any mention of symbolic links. > > I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not > followed. No. They're not followed.

[Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Jo Rhett
I just went through all available releases of the manual, plus used google to search the site, and I can't find any mention of symbolic links. I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not followed. The reason I ask is this: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capac

Re: [Bacula-users] Symbolic links

2006-02-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Kern, or others: Is there a method, anymore, for following symbolic links? It does not appear to be in the documentation. As I often symlink the current version of software into place, this is important to me. I didn't really get an answer last time I asked. I guess the next step is to read th

Re: [Bacula-users] Symbolic links

2006-02-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Does anyone know where? I looked before asking this question, mainly at > the FileSet definition, and turned up nothing other than info on hard > links. There is no similar information for soft/symbolic links, and no > mention of it in the index. OK, looking at what I hav

Re: [Bacula-users] Symbolic links

2006-02-10 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Does anyone know where? I looked before asking this question, mainly at the FileSet definition, and turned up nothing other than info on hard links. There is no similar information for soft/symbolic links, and no mention of it in the index. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ |

Re: [Bacula-users] Symbolic links

2006-02-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
Ryan Novosielski wrote: > A quick search through the manual has not turned up anything on this, so > I figure perhaps someone can help. Is the expected behavior that bacula > will not follow symbolic links? Is this configurable? When I upgrade > software, I typically link the new version into place

[Bacula-users] Symbolic links

2006-02-10 Thread Ryan Novosielski
A quick search through the manual has not turned up anything on this, so I figure perhaps someone can help. Is the expected behavior that bacula will not follow symbolic links? Is this configurable? When I upgrade software, I typically link the new version into place... I'd have to have to chan