Hello,
On 27.09.2005 11:12, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
...
Use the update command in bconsole, for example 'update media
volume=Bacula02, then select 1, and set it to used, full or append.
Thanks, that worked fine. I miss, however, that sort of command
documentation. Maybe I have been unlucky find
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 21:25 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26.09.2005 20:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> ...
> > Reading first block showed:
> >
> > 000 002 272 241 270 \0 \0 \0 277 \0 \0 \0 \0 B B 0 2
>
> > So the volume _is_ OK.
> >
> > Next challenge, how do I find
Hi,
On 26.09.2005 20:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
...
Reading first block showed:
000 002 272 241 270 \0 \0 \0 277 \0 \0 \0 \0 B B 0 2
So the volume _is_ OK.
Next challenge, how do I find and remove the error flag from the
catalog?
Use the update command in bconsole, for e
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 13:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 26.09.2005 11:45, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> ...
> >>>First of all I like to understand what bacula is trying to tell me with
> >>>these messages. Secondly can a wrong tape (not a bacula volume) cause
> >>>this sort of errors and a
Hello,
On 26.09.2005 11:45, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
...
First of all I like to understand what bacula is trying to tell me with
these messages. Secondly can a wrong tape (not a bacula volume) cause
this sort of errors and are the volumes which bacula would not accept
now unusable for bacula forever
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:55 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 25.09.2005 14:39, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> > I am still in the testing phase and I get what seems to me to be a
> > strange problem. The scenario is as follows:
> >
> > 1. Bacula daemons are started normally.
> > 2. bconsole
Martin Simmons wrote one day and it is a very good idea:
"I think the first thing is to check what is on the tape (without bacula-sd
running) using unix commands such as:
mt rewind
dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/null
dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/null
dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/null
dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/nul
Hello,
On 25.09.2005 14:39, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I am still in the testing phase and I get what seems to me to be a
strange problem. The scenario is as follows:
1. Bacula daemons are started normally.
2. bconsole is started.
3. *run Client1 is issued.
4. Bacula sends "Intervention needed" mess
I am still in the testing phase and I get what seems to me to be a
strange problem. The scenario is as follows:
1. Bacula daemons are started normally.
2. bconsole is started.
3. *run Client1 is issued.
4. Bacula sends "Intervention needed" message asking to mount Volume
"Bacula02" on Storage Devi
