Re: [Bacula-users] I have a bug in 2.2.7 DIR: misbehave on kill

2008-02-06 Thread Peter Much
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> aka Arno Lehmann schrieb mit Datum Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:42:57 +0100 in m2n.bacula.users: |I can safely say that this is not a general problem: I have a test / |demonstration setup where I have the DIR running in a virtual machine. |The jobs are scheduled at the full hour and

Re: [Bacula-users] I have a bug in 2.2.7 DIR: misbehave on kill

2008-02-06 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 06.02.2008 13:36, Dan Langille wrote: > Peter Much wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a functional problem with the director daemon. >> >> The problem depends on the configuration of the scheduler. As long as >> there are only schedules in effect with any granularity of *daily*, >> there i

Re: [Bacula-users] I have a bug in 2.2.7 DIR: misbehave on kill

2008-02-06 Thread Peter Much
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> aka Dan Langille schrieb mit Datum Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:36:21 -0500 in m2n.bacula.users: |Peter Much wrote: |Please provide a very specific example. I know you gave a general example, |but a specific example allows others to test the same thing and see if this | is a probl

Re: [Bacula-users] I have a bug in 2.2.7 DIR: misbehave on kill

2008-02-06 Thread Dan Langille
Peter Much wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a functional problem with the director daemon. > > The problem depends on the configuration of the scheduler. As long as > there are only schedules in effect with any granularity of *daily*, > there is no problem. > > But as soon as you configure a

[Bacula-users] I have a bug in 2.2.7 DIR: misbehave on kill

2008-02-05 Thread Peter Much
Hi all, I have a functional problem with the director daemon. The problem depends on the configuration of the scheduler. As long as there are only schedules in effect with any granularity of *daily*, there is no problem. But as soon as you configure a schedule with any kind of granulari