Peter Much wrote:
> Hi all,
>   
>   I have a functional problem with the director daemon.
>   
> The problem depends on the configuration of the scheduler. As long as
> there are only schedules in effect with any granularity of *daily*,
> there is no problem.
>   
> But as soon as you configure a schedule with any kind of granularity
> of *hourly* (that is, a schedule that is run at specific times every
> hour) *AND* put that schedule into effect by calling it from some
> job, then following problem appears:
>   
>  The SIGTERM signal doesn't work anymore. Instead of terminating, the
> bacula-dir goes into an endless loop and eats all available cpu.
> Sending *another* SIGTERM at that point will terminate the daemon
> correctly.
> 
>   The problem therein is: when doing a main system shutdown, the
> rc.shutdown will send _one_ SIGTERM to the daemon, and then will
> just wait for the daemon to terminate.
> It will wait for 15 minutes; then a watchdog hits in and does a
> forced halt of the whole system - which isnt nice for all the other
> innocent daemons running.
> 
>   It is not too troublesome, as we usually do the shutdowning only
> twice a year, but it should occasionally be fixed, just for beauty.

Please provide a very specific example.  I know you gave a general example, 
but a specific example allows others to test the same thing and see if this 
  is a problem that can be reproduced on multiple platforms.

-- 
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference: http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon  - The PostgreSQL Conference:    http://www.pgcon.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to