Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-15 Thread Lars Köller
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Caley (rc) > writes: > > rc> Must be a hold over then. > > I had a blinding flash of the obvious overnight and remembered that we > have the same version of the bacula-server port on another machine: > > 07:25 auk:root:- pkg_info -L bacula-1.32c >

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Richard Caley
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Caley (rc) writes: rc> Must be a hold over then. I had a blinding flash of the obvious overnight and remembered that we have the same version of the bacula-server port on another machine: 07:25 auk:root:- pkg_info -L bacula-1.32c Informat

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Ian
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Michael 'buk' Scherer wrote: Bacula names all config-files foo.conf.sample, as every other port. So what gets deleted is the ,sample-file, not the .conf-file you created afterwards. [snip freebsd port system not removing configs] However, the 'uninstall' target in the makefil

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Michael Scherer
Hey Richard. I still can't confirm that "bug" using portupgrade. My configfiles stay were they are and aren't touched. make uninstall isn't executed too, as you might know the portdb keeps a file-list for every package and uses that during uninstall. HINT: ---> Backing up the old version <--- --->

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Richard Caley
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Scherer (ms) writes: ms> I still can't confirm that "bug" using portupgrade. ms> My configfiles stay were they are and aren't touched. Must be a hold over then. My bacula was quite old (1.32c). Perhaps there was a problem with the port back then which got f

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Richard Caley
> Bacula names all config-files foo.conf.sample, as every other port. > So what gets deleted is the ,sample-file, not the .conf-file you created > afterwards. No, the bacula-dir.conf has definitely dissapeared, and it was definitely there this morning when I got the error which prompted me to upg

Re: [Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Michael 'buk' Scherer
Bacula names all config-files foo.conf.sample, as every other port. So what gets deleted is the ,sample-file, not the .conf-file you created afterwards. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc>ll bacula-* -rw-r- 1 root wheel 6883 Apr 13 10:15 bacula-dir.conf -rw-r- 1 root wheel 6883 Mar 31

[Bacula-users] Don't Delete My Config Files!

2005-04-13 Thread Richard Caley
I just upgraded my bacula instalation onf FreeBSD. This deleted my config files. So far as I can tell, this is because bacula's make uninstall unconditionally deletes them. I can't begin to express just how stupid and evil this behaviour is in a public mailing list. Now I have to manually co