> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Caley (rc) > writes: > > rc> Must be a hold over then. > > I had a blinding flash of the obvious overnight and remembered that we > have the same version of the bacula-server port on another machine: > > 07:25 auk:root:- pkg_info -L bacula-1.32c > > Information for bacula-1.32c: > > Files: > /usr/local/etc/query.sql > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bacula.sh.sample > [ ... lots more ... ] > /usr/local/etc/bacula-barcodes > /usr/local/etc/console.conf > /usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf > /usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf > /usr/local/etc/bacula-dir.conf > > Ie the configuration files are indeed in the list of installed files, > and so will be deleted on upgrade. > > So, it looks like the port was broken back when 1.32c was current and > is waiting to delete some of the vital essense from unsuspecting > bacula instalations all over the world. :-)
You are right, it was a bug up to 1.32. Than I fixed it. Sorry but my ports are not perfect :-( Regards Lars -- Lars Köller EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
