In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Caley (rc) writes:
rc> Must be a hold over then.
I had a blinding flash of the obvious overnight and remembered that we
have the same version of the bacula-server port on another machine:
07:25 auk:root:- pkg_info -L bacula-1.32c
Information for bacula-1.32c:
Files:
/usr/local/etc/query.sql
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/bacula.sh.sample
[ ... lots more ... ]
/usr/local/etc/bacula-barcodes
/usr/local/etc/console.conf
/usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf
/usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf
/usr/local/etc/bacula-dir.conf
Ie the configuration files are indeed in the list of installed files,
and so will be deleted on upgrade.
So, it looks like the port was broken back when 1.32c was current and
is waiting to delete some of the vital essense from unsuspecting
bacula instalations all over the world. :-)
--
Mail me as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _O_
|<
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
