On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:13 AM, xunil321 wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> we want to setup Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 SP1 in the following way:
> 1x Director and three DEDICATED SD servers (each system has 6TB disk storage
> and one LTO-4 tape autochanger). We learnt from this list that this
> separation
> ca
>> Dear John, I am confused now:
>> It is still not clear to me how the Director does know where the File
>> Storage is
>> attached? As I wrote we have 3 dedicated SD storage servers, the Director
>> server
>> has no storage to hold the backup.
>> Or do you mean that we have also to run the Directo
John M. Drescher wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:13 AM, xunil321
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>> we want to setup Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 SP1 in the following way:
>> 1x Director and three DEDICATED SD servers (each system has 6TB disk
>> storage
>> and one LTO-4 tape autochanger). We learn
Excerpts from xunil321's message of Sat Jun 25 09:13:26 -0400 2011:
> - how to we have to configure/compile Bacula 5.0.3 for the DEDICATED SD
>servers ie with the same options as we did it for the director?
Build RPMs one one system that split the whole package out into dir,
fd and sd sub-
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:13 AM, xunil321 wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> we want to setup Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 SP1 in the following way:
> 1x Director and three DEDICATED SD servers (each system has 6TB disk storage
> and one LTO-4 tape autochanger). We learnt from this list that this
> separation
>
Dear all,
we want to setup Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 SP1 in the following way:
1x Director and three DEDICATED SD servers (each system has 6TB disk storage
and one LTO-4 tape autochanger). We learnt from this list that this
separation
can be done ie director and sd can live on different machines.
