On Tuesday, November 19, 2024 9:56:18 PM CET Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler -
(scar) wrote:
> Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote on 11/18/24 11:35 AM:
> > check the availability of the server resources
> > check the logs of the Postgres service
> > check the database connection parameters
>
> Everyt
Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote on 11/18/24 11:35 AM:
> check the availability of the server resources
> check the logs of the Postgres service
> check the database connection parameters
Everything checked out, so I restarted all the bacula services.
Everything is running fine again! I gu
It seems there was a medium security update released for postgresql-13
on Debian bookworm (oldstable), and right after that bacula stopped
working due to "no connection to the server". For example, got this
e-mail about the catalog backup:
> 15-Nov 20:36 hind-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: bdb.h:143 b
On Monday, November 18, 2024 6:57:30 PM CET Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler -
(scar) wrote:
> It seems there was a medium security update released for postgresql-13
> on Debian bookworm (oldstable), and right after that bacula stopped
> working due to "no connection to the server". For example, got this
Thanks for checking that for me. It hadn't occurred to me there might be
that dependency. I used -n to try this out pending arrival of the intended
target machine and didn't want to mess up the current installation. I'll
wait to try a live build on the target when it appears.
-Chris-
On Sat, 2 Se
Hi Chris, I had to delete some of the history of this email as there is
a 40KB max size for submissions so my response got held.
Some of your .configure options are different from mine so I just ran
the same commands as you did and I got the same error that you did.
I noticed you had run make
Thanks for confirming that.
When compiling with --enable-client-only I get the following error from make
$ sudo bash make-client-only.sh
...
echo "Making libbacfind.la ..."
/usr/src/bacula-11.0.6/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/g++
-o libbacfind.la find.lo match.lo find_one.lo att
Hi Chris,
With --enable-client-only then no database is required on the client for
bacula.
I have two laptops and a desktop that are running with only an FD.
Regards,
Adolf
On 01/09/2023 22:54, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Bacula 9.x is also the latest version available through the Debian
repo. T
Bacula 9.x is also the latest version available through the Debian repo.
There doesn't seem to be a move to upgrade that to 11 or 13. That's why I
built v11 from source. Like you I run the dir/sd/fd on the same machine so
compiled the complete package. I never had to build an fd only till now.
-Ch
I don't know for sure because I have only deployed a client with SD / Dir
and FD all on the same machine, but I would imagine that an FD client only
machine wouldn't need a database. I'm pretty confident that if one was
needed, it would be installed as a dependency of the bacula client package.
My
I hadn't spotted that there is a link on this page though it does say an
email will be sent. That doesn't seem to be the case. I followed that
through to the directory of debs and found the bullseye/11 clients. As you
say, that should be OK for Debian 12.
Am I correct in thinking that it isn't nec
Oh no, I gave you wrong information. I'm sorry.
I don't think they email you. After you submit your name and email address,
the followup page that loads has the repo link in the middle of the page It
says " You may now access the bacula binaries located here (please bookmark
this link)." where "he
I waited a while but never got the registration email. Tried again and
waited some more so gave up. The only way seems to be to download from
sourceforge and compile from source. There is a compile flag for client
only --enable_client_only, see the manual at;
https://www.bacula.org/11.0.x-manuals
I don't know about adding the FD only but I do know that bacula maintains a
repo for Debian with 13.x binaries in it. To get access to this repo, you
need to go to download on bacula.org, register, get the code they include
in an URL in your registration email, and configure the repo in Debian. I
g
Thank-you. I registered and am awaiting the registration email.
-Chris-
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, 17:15 Rob Gerber, wrote:
> I don't know about adding the FD only but I do know that bacula maintains
> a repo for Debian with 13.x binaries in it. To get access to this repo, you
> need to go to downloa
I need to install the fd only on a debian 12 system. The v11+ packages on
sourceforge are for the complete suite and the debian repository is only at
v9.x today. I don't see a package on sourceforge for the fd alone. Do I
need to compile it from source?
If so, can anyone help with a script of the
Oh wow, the 11.0.2 Debs are for Debian 10 or older. Debian 10 already is quite
old and has gone home to die soon.
Debian 11 is the train we are riding.
Have there been announcements when the Debs will be made available for Debian
11, too?
Cheers
J/C
> On 19. Jun 2022, at 13:49, Josh Fisher
Many thanks Marcin. As usual your suggestion was perfect. The error is now gone.
The first two lines should be on one line or there is an error.
Best
-Chris-
> On 31 May 2021, at 04:18, Marcin Haba wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> You can try to change baculum.list to this:
>
> deb [ arch=amd6
Hello Chris,
You can try to change baculum.list to this:
deb [ arch=amd64 ]
http://www.bacula.org/downloads/baculum/stable/debian buster main
deb-src http://www.bacula.org/downloads/baculum/stable/debian buster main
Best regards,
Marcin Haba (gani)
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 23:21, Chris Wilkinson
May I ask the list why I'm seeing this error from 'apt-get update'.
Reading package lists... Done
N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-i386/Packages' as
repository 'http://www.bacula.org/downloads/baculum/stable/debian buster
InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'
...
Many thanks to all who responded.
Regards
Chris Wilkinson
On Wed, 23 May 2018, 2:16 p.m. itlinux_igtp, wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> From the official repos you can get 7.4.4.
> apt-cache showpkg bacula
> Package: bacula
> Versions:
> 7.4.4+dfsg-6
> (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_str
Hi Chris,
From the official repos you can get 7.4.4.
apt-cache showpkg bacula
Package: bacula
Versions:
7.4.4+dfsg-6
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_stretch_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
Description Language:
File:
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_d
$ apt policy bacula
bacula:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.4.4+dfsg-6
Version table:
9.0.7+dfsg-4 750
750 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian testing/main amd64
Packages
750 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian testing/main i386
Packages
50 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian u
On 23.05.2018 11:52, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> What version of Bacula is currently provided through apt-get?
Debian provides 7.4.4 in the native Stretch repository and 9.0.7 via
stretch-backports:
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/bacula
https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch-backport
What version of Bacula is currently provided through apt-get?
Regards
Chris Wilkinson
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__
Hmmm I assumed Hauke and Luca were taking good care of Bacula in
Debian, since I can't possibly do it for the time being.
While I
understand your reasons (and /opt/bacula is certainly not the worst
place to install to), I guess having a unified set of packages for both
Bacula Enterprise an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2014 01:27 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Anyone creating Debian
packages?
Bacula.org will release them.
We have the binaries packaged already, but
We have two obstacles:
1. Installing
Anyone creating Debian packages?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out
hi,
@mark && @ Radosław
thanks :-) I didn't recognized the filesize in stat. I used sqlite3 + VACUUM to
reduce the file. So, for now I have to search if there any more files with that
size.
cu denny
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Hello,
2013/11/12 Denny Fuchs
> hi,
>
> I have one file:
>
> On the fileserver:
>
> root@FILES:~# LANG="C" stat
>
> /export/disc03/users1/foobar/.mozilla/firefox/9m9i53h9.default/formhistory.sqlite
> File:
> `/export/disc03/users1/foobar/.mozilla/firefox/9m9i53h9.default/formhistory.sqlite'
hi,
I have one file:
On the fileserver:
root@FILES:~# LANG="C" stat
/export/disc03/users1/foobar/.mozilla/firefox/9m9i53h9.default/formhistory.sqlite
File:
`/export/disc03/users1/foobar/.mozilla/firefox/9m9i53h9.default/formhistory.sqlite'
Size: 4398046510080 Blocks: 40 IO Block
On 6/07/2012 12:37 PM, comport3 wrote:
> Jim, you are truly a life saver! Thank you very, very much!!!
FYI, Debian has just closed this bug today.
Version 175-4 of the udev package will re-enable the sg devices again.
It isn't in Debian testing yet as far as I can see, but I guess will filter
dow
Jim, you are truly a life saver! Thank you very, very much!!!
+--
|This was sent by compo...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+
On 6/07/2012 5:41 AM, comport3 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Performing a test upgrade of our Debian Squeeze server to the new Wheezy
> release has broken the mtx package.
>
> MTX relies on a /dev/sg* device (under Squeeze, the autochanger was /dev/sg4)
> - however under Wheezy there is only /dev/sch0.
Hi All,
Performing a test upgrade of our Debian Squeeze server to the new Wheezy
release has broken the mtx package.
MTX relies on a /dev/sg* device (under Squeeze, the autochanger was /dev/sg4) -
however under Wheezy there is only /dev/sch0.
Trying to run mtx against it returns:
mtx -f /dev/
Several months ago, as a part of upgrading my server from Lenny to Squeeze, I
upgraded Bacula from v2.4 to v5.0. After making a few configuration changes
all seemed to be operating within normal parameters. But, at some point I
noticed that my query.sql file was empty.
Before I copy over the sa
Now when I run it, it seems to have some weird errors
r...@daffy:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
end result of "aptitude dist-upgrade": segfault =(
r...@daffy:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Writing extended state information... Done
The foll
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:39:18 +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
>>
>> Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
>>
>> I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
>> finis
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
>> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
>
> Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
>
> I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
> finished updating all the FDs with your packages.
>
> Looks like the pg
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
finished updating all the FDs with your packages.
Looks like the pgsql director and sd packages are broken
The message "packages have been kept back" is an apt-get message; you
can find details about it with a Google search.
Basically, it means that the structure of the packages has been changed
between what is installed and what you are trying to install, and
apt-get is warning you that this is mor
> r...@daffy:/storage/ftproot# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists...
> Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> *bacula-client bacula-common bacula-console bacula-director-common
> bacula-director-mysql bacula-fd bacul
OK I tried again, and it seemed to work, but bconsole is not reporting the
right version
r...@daffy:/storage/ftproot# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
*bacula-client bacula-common
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:51:08 +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Chris Cameron wrote:
>> The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
>>
>>
>> r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
>
> The repository at:
>
> http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula
>
> is empty, which is why it's n
Chris Cameron wrote:
> The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
>
>
> r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
The repository at:
http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula
is empty, which is why it's not doing anything. It looks like the
package files didn't make it into the
John Drescher wrote:
>> I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and
>> there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version.
>>
>> First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive.
>>
> I believe that directive went away years ago
The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release.gpg
Ign http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Translation-en_US
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrep
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:21:32 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote:
> Now I get
>
> W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/
> Release (expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker) W: You may
> want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
sorry, copy&paste error.
Now I get
W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release
(expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
~Chris Cameron
Sent from: Houston TX United States.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Thoma
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:47:34 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I added
>
> deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ deb-src
> http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
>
> to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning:
>
> W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula
I added
deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
deb-src http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning:
W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the publi
> I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and
> there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version.
>
> First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive.
>
I believe that directive went away years ago because the default is to
a
I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and
there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version.
First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive.
Second is I can no longer modify a requested job to place its out put in
a sel
Hi Chris
> Would you also for Ubuntu? :)
> Chris Cameron
here they are:
README:
- use at your own risk
- openssl is enabled
- no qt/wx gui's included
- maybe one has to apply the DB upgrade himself: the sql-file is found
here /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/bacula-director-mysql/upgrade/
mysql
Would you also for Ubuntu? :)
---
Chris Cameron
Sent from: Houston TX United States.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> hi
>
> i'll provide the new 2.5.42-b2 packages for Debian Lenny/Etch i386/amd64.
>
>
> README:
> - use
hi
i'll provide the new 2.5.42-b2 packages for Debian Lenny/Etch i386/amd64.
README:
- use at your own risk
- openssl is enabled
- no qt/wx gui's included
- maybe one has to apply the DB upgrade himself: the sql-file is found
here /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/bacula-director-mysql/upgrade/
m
On Tue 24 February 2009 04:11:17 am Daniele Palumbo wrote:
> Il giovedì 12 febbraio 2009 10:30:08 Foo ha scritto:
> > I think a lot of people would appreciate this, can you add it to the
> > Wiki? (http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=howtos)
>
> seems to be online:
> http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?
Il giovedì 12 febbraio 2009 10:30:08 Foo ha scritto:
> I think a lot of people would appreciate this, can you add it to the Wiki?
> (http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=howtos)
seems to be online:
http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=howto_build_deb_binary_packages_and_create_a_package_repository_for
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:17:33 +0100, Bill Merriam
wrote:
> I would also be happy to provide the scripts for anybody that wants to
> build their own packages/repository.
I think a lot of people would appreciate this, can you add it to the Wiki?
(http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=howtos)
---
Thanks to everyone that responded to me about this. I am backing up to
portable USB drives and it is TOO easy for somebody to walk out the door
with the backup disk. I had to have encryption.
I succeeded in building my own packages for Debian Lenny and Ubuntu
Intrepid. I wrote a script to fetch
Historically it has been my experience that the package maintainer for
Bacula in Debian has only packaged release code. Looking at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula.html shows that the unstable
version (2.4.4-1) is the same as Lenny (testing). There would be no way
to find a newer version on a
Bill Merriam wrote:
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Kern
>>
>>
> Thank you Kern for responding. I think you are saying if I can find the
> right Debian "test" or "development" repository I will have a working
> version of bacula. I will look around.
Well, every Bacula in Debian works. I guess yo
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 17:09:19 Philipp Geschke wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I dared to CC Kern... maybe he can enlighten us?
>>
>
> :-)
>
> For me the problem has been solved for quite a lot time (I rewrote all 3rd
> party GPL code that we used in the source). Unfortuna
On Monday 09 February 2009 17:09:19 Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I dared to CC Kern... maybe he can enlighten us?
:-)
For me the problem has been solved for quite a lot time (I rewrote all 3rd
party GPL code that we used in the source). Unfortunately, the problem is not
yet resolved for Deb
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So it seems like openssl is already back in main repository. (I think
> it was in contrib before).
> Here are the bugs for debian. I don't see a bug for openssl support.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=bacula
>
> What you are saying i
Hi,
I dared to CC Kern... maybe he can enlighten us?
John Goerzen schrieb:
> Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So it seems like openssl is already back in main repository. (I think
>> it was in contrib before).
>> Here are the bugs for debian. I don't see a bug for openssl support.
>>
>> ht
Hello,
So it seems like openssl is already back in main repository. (I think
it was in contrib before).
Here are the bugs for debian. I don't see a bug for openssl support.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=bacula
What you are saying is that bacula should be compiled with with
Hi,
I asked basically the same thing a while ago:
http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2008-08/msg00517.html
Back then I was told, that the issue had been removed, but the Debian project
seems to not have noticed this.
Basically, while asking about Ubuntu, this really is a Debian Lenny
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html
apt-get build-dep bacula
aptitude install libssl-dev openssl
aptitude source bacula
cd bacula-2
vim debian/rules
# (change the options to enable ssl tls)
debian/rules binary
#it should now compile and pack all bacula packages
cd ..
dpk
On Feb 8, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Bill Merriam wrote:
> It appears Debian still doesn't distribute bacula packages with
> encryption enabled. Is there any news on that?
>
> There are instructions included with the debian package source on
> how to
> rebuild it with encryption. Has anybody done that
It appears Debian still doesn't distribute bacula packages with
encryption enabled. Is there any news on that?
There are instructions included with the debian package source on how to
rebuild it with encryption. Has anybody done that and made the packages
available?
I am trying to figure out ho
Marc Schiffbauer schrieb:
>
> I just uploaded updated bacula packages to the packman package
> repository (Version 2.2.8)
> [...]
Thanks for the good work!
Ralf
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challe
Hi all,
I just uploaded updated bacula packages to the packman package
repository (Version 2.2.8)
These will be available in about 4-5 hours from now on.
There are now packages for:
- Debian * sarge -> i386
*
* etch -> i386, x86_64 (amd64)
- Ubuntu * edgy (6.10) -> i386, x
On Sep 26, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Eric Böse-Wolf wrote:
> Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I thought I caught a thread on this mailing list about Debian.
>>
>> I have a box with postgresql 8.2 installed on it and is well suited
>> for putting bacula on it.
>
> Using bacula on a sid system
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought I caught a thread on this mailing list about Debian.
>
> I have a box with postgresql 8.2 installed on it and is well suited
> for putting bacula on it.
> But when I tried to install the debian packages I got hung up on the
> packages trying
I thought I caught a thread on this mailing list about Debian.
I have a box with postgresql 8.2 installed on it and is well suited
for putting bacula on it.
But when I tried to install the debian packages I got hung up on the
packages trying to install postgresql 8.1 (or at least some part of
Updated my mysql packages. test backup ran smoothly with no errors
now. Thanks to everyone that wrote in with a quick response.
Jon
On 9/24/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 24.09.2007 15:35,, Jonathan Fine wrote::
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just upgraded my sarge bacula serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 24.09.2007 15:35,, Jonathan Fine wrote::
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just upgraded my sarge bacula server and clients to your latest
>> packages. Upgrades seemed to go smoothly, but when I ran a test
>> backup form one of my clients,
Ah, I'm running the mysql that came with debian sarge, 4.0.24. Now
to hunt down updated packages.
On 9/24/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 24.09.2007 15:35,, Jonathan Fine wrote::
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just upgraded my sarge bacula server and clients to your latest
> > pa
Jonathan Fine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded my sarge bacula server and clients to your latest
> packages. Upgrades seemed to go smoothly, but when I ran a test
> backup form one of my clients, I received the following error at
> finish:
What version of MySQL do you have? Check with 'dpkg -l'
Hi,
24.09.2007 15:35,, Jonathan Fine wrote::
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded my sarge bacula server and clients to your latest
> packages. Upgrades seemed to go smoothly, but when I ran a test
> backup form one of my clients, I received the following error at
> finish:
>
> 24-Sep 09:28 bserv-sd: Send
Hi,
I just upgraded my sarge bacula server and clients to your latest
packages. Upgrades seemed to go smoothly, but when I ran a test
backup form one of my clients, I received the following error at
finish:
24-Sep 09:28 bserv-sd: Sending spooled attrs to the Director.
Despooling 20,209 bytes ...
On Friday 14 September 2007 01:51:25 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
> for the following distros:
>
> * Debian sarge (i386)
> * Debian etch (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu edgy (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu feisty (i386 and amd64)
Hi all,
this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
for the following distros:
* Debian sarge (i386)
* Debian etch (i386 and amd64)
* Ubuntu edgy (i386 and amd64)
* Ubuntu feisty (i386 and amd64)
The packages are based on the debian unstable packages by John
Goerzen (than
Hi,
I just upgraded my backup server but instead of going for Fedora 7 (as
planned) I had to settle for Ubuntu Server 7.04. Fedora just won't install on
this old ProLiant ML330 G3 box no matter what I tried. Wasted 3 days on it
while Ubuntu installed in less than 10 minutes. Now I need to insta
On 3/22/07, Kev Latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My question may have been answered before - what would be the
recommended approacjh to installing Bacula on a Debian box? Apt-getting
will grab you either 1.36.2, 1.38.11 or 2.0.3, depending on your flavour
of Debian (Sarge, Etch, Sid) and ther
On Thursday 22 March 2007 09:54, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/22/2007 9:23 AM, Kev Latimer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now
> > in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many
> > boxen and too complica
Hi,
On 3/22/2007 9:23 AM, Kev Latimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now
> in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many
> boxen and too complicated a combination of rsync, dump/rdump, tar and
> scp, smbclient, and
Hi all,
I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now
in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many
boxen and too complicated a combination of rsync, dump/rdump, tar and
scp, smbclient, and I'm really looking forward to a coherent platform
for onc
On 2/26/07, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As always, thanks :-)
>
> No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
>
> -- John
John, any chance to see some day the backport for the 2.0.x ?
(and BTW, thanks A LOT for t
On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As always, thanks :-)
No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
-- John
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Te
As always, thanks :-)
On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:59, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
>
> These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
> the
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Lech Karol Paw??aszek wrote:
> >Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> >experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
> [...]
>
> Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
>
> [1] -
> http://
John Goerzen napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
[...]
Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
[1] -
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=
Hello,
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
they're solid enough to do so. (Also we must wait a bit due to an
unrelated propogation to te
IEM - network operating center wrote:
> even though my questions have not much feedback, i'll post another round ;-)
>
> i have build debian-packages for bacula-2.0.2, by getting the
> source-code of bacula-2.0.2 from sourceforge and applying the
> bacula_2.0.0-1.diff that was used for building the
even though my questions have not much feedback, i'll post another round ;-)
i have build debian-packages for bacula-2.0.2, by getting the
source-code of bacula-2.0.2 from sourceforge and applying the
bacula_2.0.0-1.diff that was used for building the 2.0.0-1 packages
(found at sourceforge)
i hav
hi again
IEM - network operating center wrote:
>
> - on my woody boxes i would only need the filedaemon; i guess the
> simplest thing would be to create a debian-package for bacula-fd-static
> with no dependencies (rather than trying to compile bacula-2 on woody)
hmm, this seems to be a bit too
hallo.
i want to use bacula as my backup-solution in our network (debian; and
some windoze)
debian comes with packages for bacula-1.38.
however, i'd rather use a recent version of bacula (bugfixes! and i use
a quantum superloader3 which i suspect to cooperate more with 2.0 than
with 1.38 - i hav
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
