IEM - network operating center wrote:
> even though my questions have not much feedback, i'll post another round ;-)
>
> i have build debian-packages for bacula-2.0.2, by getting the
> source-code of bacula-2.0.2 from sourceforge and applying the
> bacula_2.0.0-1.diff that was used for building the 2.0.0-1 packages
> (found at sourceforge)
>
Indeed. I forgot to upload the 2.0.2-1 diff to sourceforge, even though
it is available online.
> i have put them online, in case anybody is interested in them (well, i
> have put them online to ease my installation on various machines; but
> the server is visible to everybody).
>
> i have build packages on both etch (updated today) and sarge machines.
> the relevant apt-lines are
>
> deb http://debian.iaem.at/ sarge/bacula/
> deb http://debian.iaem.at/ etch/bacula/
>
> (choose your flavour)
>
Mine are compiled against etch/sid. Thank you for providing the backport.
> due to the amount of responses to my question regarding statically
> linked bacula-fd, i have NOT build such an additional package.
>
It is actually almost impossible to get bacula to successfuly link
statically (at least, it has been for 1.38) due to how its dependencies
are linked.
However, bacula-fd should have a relatively small set of dinamic
dependencies, and so the need for an statically-linked version is
actually very small.
Thanks again.
J.L.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
