> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:33:22 -0400, Dan Langille said:
>
> On 10/27/2010 12:05 PM, catkins wrote:
> >
> > catkins wrote:
> >> Thanks Martin :-)
> >> [snip]
> >> Have downloaded your patch and will try using it this evening (on
> >> Slackware64 13.1) [snip] building from bacula-5.0.3.tar.gz
My apologies for thread-jacking; I was mislead into bad netiquette by the
fundamental problem being the same.
+--
|This was sent by catki...@yahoo.co.uk via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+-
On 10/31/2010 8:09 AM, catkins wrote:
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> This is for Bacula on FreeBSD 7.3?
>>
>> If so I'll patch the FreeBSD port.
>>
>> Can you try this:
>>
>> cd /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client
>> make clean&& make patch
>> cd work/bacula-5.0.3 (assuming usual port setup)
>> patch -p
Dan Langille wrote:
> This is for Bacula on FreeBSD 7.3?
>
> If so I'll patch the FreeBSD port.
>
> Can you try this:
>
> cd /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client
> make clean && make patch
> cd work/bacula-5.0.3 (assuming usual port setup)
> patch -p1 < /path-to/bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch
>
> If no
On 10/27/2010 12:05 PM, catkins wrote:
>
> catkins wrote:
>> Thanks Martin :-)
>> [snip]
>> Have downloaded your patch and will try using it this evening (on
>> Slackware64 13.1) [snip] building from bacula-5.0.3.tar.gz [snip]
>
> Thank you Martin; your patch fixed the problem :-)
>
> For anyone w
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 4:21 AM, catkins wrote:
> [snip quote]
> That's a shame. Try the various mailing list archives for bacula. I
> suggest http://marc.info
> [snip quote]
> I also suggest raising a bug report within FreeBSD.
> --
> Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
Thanks Da
On 10/26/2010 4:21 AM, catkins wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> Where can bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch be downloaded from? Is there a bug report
> for what it fixes? I searched for both without success (the attachment was
> scrubbed from Martin Simmons post as it appeared on Backup Central).
That's a shame.
Thanks Martin :-)
I tried installing the patch from the bug report without success.
Have downloaded your patch and will try using it this evening (on Slackware64
13.1). If it is not compatible I guess I can make the modifications manually
and create a patch from them to suit building from bacu
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:21:59 -0400, catkins said:
>
> Where can bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch be downloaded from? Is there a bug report
> for what it fixes? I searched for both without success (the attachment was
> scrubbed from Martin Simmons post as it appeared on Backup Central).
This archi
Hello :-)
Where can bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch be downloaded from? Is there a bug report
for what it fixes? I searched for both without success (the attachment was
scrubbed from Martin Simmons post as it appeared on Backup Central).
Alternatively, there's what looks like the same bug at
http:/
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:46:34 -0400, Dan Langille said:
>
> On 9/13/2010 7:21 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > On 09/13/10 19:04, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
> you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
>
> __Ma
On 9/13/2010 7:04 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
>>> Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
>>> you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
>>>
>>> __Martin
>>
>> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
> the
>> first place. I will investigate app
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:04:53 -0700, Doug Sampson said:
>
> > > Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
> > > you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
> > >
> > > __Martin
> >
> > Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
> the
> > f
On 9/13/2010 7:21 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 09/13/10 19:04, Doug Sampson wrote:
Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
__Martin
>>>
>>> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned th
On 09/13/10 19:04, Doug Sampson wrote:
>>> Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
>>> you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
>>>
>>> __Martin
>>
>> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
> the
>> first place. I will investigate applyi
> > Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
> > you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
> >
> > __Martin
>
> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
the
> first place. I will investigate applying this patch and report back.
>
The patc
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 03:22 AM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot build bacula-client 5.0.3 on
> FreeBSD 7.3
>
> >>>>> O
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:59:00 -0700, Doug Sampson said:
>
> Today I went ahead to upgrade bacula-client to 5.0.3 from 5.0.2 and the
> build broke down at the point listed below:
>
> Linking bacula-fd ...
> /usr/bin/c++ -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L../lib -L../findlib -o bacula-fd
> filed.o authe
On 9/10/2010 2:59 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Today I went ahead to upgrade bacula-client to 5.0.3 from 5.0.2 and the
> build broke down at the point listed below:
>
> Linking bacula-fd ...
> /usr/bin/c++ -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L../lib -L../findlib -o bacula-fd
> filed.o authenticate.o acl.o backup.
Today I went ahead to upgrade bacula-client to 5.0.3 from 5.0.2 and the
build broke down at the point listed below:
Linking bacula-fd ...
/usr/bin/c++ -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L../lib -L../findlib -o bacula-fd
filed.o authenticate.o acl.o backup.o estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o
filed_conf.o hea
20 matches
Mail list logo
