On 09/13/10 19:04, Doug Sampson wrote:
>>> Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure? If so,
>>> you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
>>>
>>> __Martin
>>
>> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
> the
>> first place. I will investigate applying this patch and report back.
>>
>
> The patch worked. To be accurate, the command as follows:
>
> # patch< /path/to/bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch
>
> resulted in only one out of the four patches being applied (the second).
> Manually editing the two files for the remaining three patches did it.
> Did I do this wrong?
As long as they were applied carefully and at the correct places, manual
patching is usually fine. It's just time-consuming. If the only
problem is a line number offset, patch will usually spot it and apply
the patch in the correct place in the code anyway.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
