There was no response on my eMail - same problem on 9.0.5 - is this a
bug or not?
I'm to lazy to familizise myself on filing a bug report.
Ralf Brinkmann
Am 29.09.2017 um 11:22 schrieb Ralf Brinkmann:
Am 28.09.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Ralf Brinkmann:
It is caused by using the following line in
Am 28.09.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Ralf Brinkmann:
It is caused by using the following line in bash backup start and end
scripts:
echo release | bconsole
The command allways askes for a slot number - unneccessarily. The bsock
error then is repeated 4 times.
I don't know whether the slotnumber ha
I found the cause for the following daemon message:
Subject: Bacula daemon message
15-Sep 01:29 lx-vihost-1-dir JobId 0: Error: bsock.c:544 Bsock send
while terminated=1 on call to client:127.0.0.1:9101
It is caused by using the following line in bash backup start and end
scripts:
echo r
On 6.Sept.2017 I changed from Bacula Version 7.4.5 to Version 9.0.3. Not
any .conf-file was changed for the last twelve month.
Bacula setup:
--with-mysql --enable-conio --enable-bat HP 1x8 G2 Autoloader with
Ultrium 6 SAS
Bat and Bconsole still showing all jobs are running fine - everything is
ory
From: Michael Schwager
mailto:mschwa...@mochotrading.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 1:09 PM
To: Heitor Faria mailto:hei...@bacula.com.br>>
Cc: bacula-users
mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> I agree with Ana with the fact it is probably not a bug. Even in the
> hypothesis Bacula is sending delayed messages this is the reason there is a
> time stamp on each log message. Yes: the connection error happened. Yes:
> daemon messages ca
My mailbox is in CDT (5 hours behind UTC). The backup host is in UTC, hence
the log entries (and mail headers, too, btw) show times in UTC.
This is why I created the logging frontend script: in order to debug
Becula's mail messaging, I want to see what *Bacula* is trying to do; I
don't want to get
instead (for example Ana’s mail I’m replying to has a
>> timestamp of 4:06 inside, but in Outlook’s message list it says 4:09).
>> From: Ana Emília M. Arruda [mailto: emiliaarr...@gmail.com ]
>> Sent: 12 August 2015 4:06
>> To: Michael Schwager < mschwa...@mochotrading.com
mailto:emiliaarr...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 12 August 2015 4:06
> *To:* Michael Schwager
> *Cc:* Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come
> from?
>
>
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> From your first post, the header o
4:06
To: Michael Schwager
Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
Hello Michael,
From your first post, the header of the email shows a 6:00 AM time, not the
11:00 AM. Are your sure they are the same e-mails? Is there any
Hello Michael,
From your first post, the header of the email shows a 6:00 AM time, not
the 11:00 AM. Are your sure they are the same e-mails? Is there any other
e-mail in bac...@example.com mailbox that arrived at 11:00 AM?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bacula
Date: Sun, Aug 9,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Martin Simmons
wrote:
>
> Looks like a bug to me (I've just created
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2159).
Thanks. I have contributed to your bug report.
*- Mike Schwager (aka, "The Most Greyish of Gnomes")*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LL
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Andreas Nastke
wrote:
> check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
> which servers were involved.
>
I did that, but in any event my own logging (see my reply to Ana on this
thread) shows that Bacula certainly sent a message, and it was at that tim
Thanks for the reply, Ana. But the mail *was* from Bacula. My
bacula-dir.conf looks like this:
Messages {
Name = Daemon
mailcommand = "/usr/local/bin/my_smtp -h mailhub -f \"\(Bacula\) \<
bac...@example.com\>\" -s \"Bacula daemon message\" %r"
...so I can debug those sneaky mail problems :-)
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:01:43 -0500, Michael Schwager said:
>
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
> why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
> below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't kno
hi,
check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
which servers were involved.
Michael Schwager schrieb:
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
> why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
> below) that I'd rect
Hello Michael,
It seems not to be an issue with Bacula. Instead, maybe this mail had been
queued in your system and relayed at a later time.
Best regards,
Ana
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Michael Schwager <
mschwa...@mochotrading.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an emai
Hello,
Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't know
why I received this message now, and I'd like to prevent it from recurring
} resource in your
> Bacula-dir.conf...
>
> Ben Roberts
>
> FROM: Polcari, Joe (Contractor) [mailto:joe_polc...@cable.comcast.com]
> SENT: 20 January 2015 16:39
> TO: Roberts, Ben; mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
> CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> SUBJECT: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacu
On 01/20/2015 02:35 PM, Polcari, Joe (Contractor) wrote:
> My problem is I’m setting up many SDs on FreeNAS using re-purposed
Isolon boxes. I estimate what it can hold and configure it (add clients)
but it all depends on the data volume, which for the systems I’m backing
up, is extremely variable,
active data? It should only purge what’s
expired.
From: Roberts, Ben [mailto:ben.robe...@gsacapital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:48 AM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
I think you could easily achieve
2015 16:39
To: Roberts, Ben; mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
This is all disk storage. I’m trying to truncate all expired volumes
immediately after all backups have completed so as to have maximum space
available when
y 20, 2015 11:30 AM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor); mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
Isn’t that an incredibly dangerous command to run automatically? What are you
actually trying to achieve that bacaula’s inter
...@devnull.net.nz
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
Aha! Found the source, now how do I stop the message?
RunScript {
RunsWhen=After
RunsOnClient=No
Console = "purge volume action=all storage=File allpools"
fault Pool definition.
From: mike.br...@devnull.net.nz [mailto:mike.br...@devnull.net.nz]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
I doubt that this is a databse issue.
Messages fr
...@devnull.net.nz]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
I doubt that this is a databse issue.
Messages from console commands in Job RunScripts are logged against jobid 0.
In
something significant about "JobID 0"?
>
> FROM: Brady, Mike [mailto:mike.br...@devnull.net.nz]
> SENT: Saturday, January 17, 2015 8:27 PM
> TO: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> SUBJECT: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
>
> What about other users
: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
What about other users crontabs? The bacula user for instance.
Or perhaps a RunScript on one of your Bacula Jobs?
As Bryn said, this is not something that Bacula is doing on its own.
Regards
Mike
On 2015-01-18 09:29, Polcari, Joe (Contractor) wrote:
[root
e database causing this.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Arlofski [mailto:waa-bac...@revpol.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 8:42 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
On 01/17/2015 03:29 PM, Polcari, Joe (Contractor) wro
tab -l
>
> no crontab for root
>
> [root@cdcdbaculadir ~]#
>
> FROM: Bryn Hughes [mailto:li...@nashira.ca]
> SENT: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:13 PM
> TO: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> SUBJECT: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
>
> Are
On 01/17/2015 03:29 PM, Polcari, Joe (Contractor) wrote:> [root@cdcdbaculadir
> ~]# crontab -l
>
> no crontab for root
Hi Joe,
It may be that a job is running as a user other than root,
try looking in /var/run/cron/crontabs (location may vary depending on
distribution (assuming Linux here), and
[root@cdcdbaculadir ~]# crontab -l
no crontab for root
[root@cdcdbaculadir ~]#
From: Bryn Hughes [mailto:li...@nashira.ca]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:13 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message
Are you SURE there isn't anything l
Are you SURE there isn't anything like a crontab somewhere that someone
set up? This very very very very much has to be something that is being
either typed in to bconsole or executed via a script somewhere. It
isn't something Bacula is doing on its own.
Bryn
On 2015-01-17 10:54 AM, Polcari
Nope, none of that. No admin jobs. All my storage is File. Backups and restores
work fine.
From: Roberts, Ben [mailto:ben.robe...@gsacapital.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:05 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor); bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Bacula daemon message
Do you h
Do you have an admin job in your config that's running console commands? It
looks like something is executing purge commands automatically which sounds
really rather dangerous to the health of your backups. The good news is it
doesn't seem to be working because you no longer have a "File" storag
Hello,
On 2/22/2006 4:15 AM, Erich Prinz wrote:
Not unless you're dead set on getting the full monty report via email.
The error is simply telling you the dir was unable to send an email.
... because the mail was too large.
The reason for that is most probably that you've included every res
Not unless you're dead set on getting the full monty report via email.
The error is simply telling you the dir was unable to send an email.
E
On Feb 21, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I was restoring a large amount of data via tape to an alternate
client.
From just checking the si
Hello,
I was restoring a large amount of data via tape to an alternate client.
From just checking the size of the restore it looks like all went well,
except this message. Do i worry about this? Possibly related possibly not,
when i went in to restore and selected option 1 it didn't bring up
38 matches
Mail list logo
