Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 06 March 2006 13:40, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:59:00 + (GMT), david robert > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > thanks for your reply.I am really out of ideas my tape drive permissions > > as follows > > > > crwxrwxrwx 1 root tape 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:3

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Dan Langille a écrit : > David: are you subscribed to this mailing list? Did you get this > email? I think he is, as I've only replied to the list, not to individual email adresses. -- Baptiste MALGUY - IT Engineer SOLSOFT PGP Fingerprint: 2A90 B6D1 855F 1584 FE

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Dan Langille
David: are you subscribed to this mailing list? Did you get this email? Please read below for my suggestions. On 6 Mar 2006 at 12:48, Baptiste Malguy wrote: > Dan Langille a écrit : > > On 6 Mar 2006 at 8:24, david robert wrote: > > > > > >>crwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 The

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Dan Langille
David: You need to slow down, and read the list, and follow the suggestions. What is said below is IMPORTANT. On 6 Mar 2006 at 13:40, Baptiste Malguy wrote: > david robert a écrit : > > thanks for your reply.I am really out of ideas my tape drive permissions > > as follows > > > > crwxrwxrwx 1

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Dan Langille
On 6 Mar 2006 at 14:21, david robert wrote: > the problem is really strange i am really looking for expert help here > i know there are very good experts in this group.My strange thing is > bacula director daemon is saying it is starting and i could not see > ant process running.I have checked all

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread david robert
the problem is really strange i am really looking for expert help here i know there are very good experts in this group.My strange thing is bacula director daemon is saying it is starting and i could not see ant process running.I have checked all configuration file syntax everything is correct  

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:59:00 + (GMT), david robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > thanks for your reply.I am really out of ideas my tape drive permissions > as follows > > crwxrwxrwx 1 root tape 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bacula 9810 2006-03-06 09:14

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Baptiste Malguy
david robert a écrit : > thanks for your reply.I am really out of ideas my tape drive permissions > as follows > > crwxrwxrwx 1 root tape 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 Wow, this is dangerous ! Others must not be able to read and/or write your tape device ! I strongly advice your to remove read and w

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread david robert
thanks for your reply.I am really out of ideas my tape drive permissions as follows   crwxrwxrwx  1 root tape 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root   bacula 9810 2006-03-06 09:14 bacula-dir.conf-rwxr-xr-x  1 root   root    912 2006-03-03 19:24 bacula-fd.conf-rwxr-xr-x  1 bacula bacula 195

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Dan Langille a écrit : > On 6 Mar 2006 at 8:24, david robert wrote: > > >>crwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 >> >> out as above and thanks for your help > > > That is the problem. Bacula has no permissions to write to st0. > > >>Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread Dan Langille
On 6 Mar 2006 at 8:24, david robert wrote: > crwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 > > out as above and thanks for your help That is the problem. Bacula has no permissions to write to st0. > Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 Mar 2006 at 19:46, david robert wrote: >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-06 Thread david robert
crwxrwxrwx  1 root root 9, 0 2005-02-26 06:38 st0 out as above and thanks for your helpDan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3 Mar 2006 at 19:46, david robert wrote:> Hi guys,> > I am running debian 3.1 with adaptec scsi tape drive card and I am> running bacula 1.36.2 debian package and i ha

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-03 Thread Dan Langille
On 3 Mar 2006 at 19:46, david robert wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am running debian 3.1 with adaptec scsi tape drive card and I am > running bacula 1.36.2 debian package and i have configured my > director,storage and fd when i try to restart the director daemon it > will restart but when i went to

[Bacula-users] Bacula BUG with debian 3.1 and bacula debian package

2006-03-03 Thread david robert
Hi guys,I am running debian 3.1 with  adaptec scsi tape drive card and I am running bacula 1.36.2 debian package and i have configured my director,storage and fd when i try to restart the director daemon it will restart but when i went to process check it is not showing and the messages file is ha