Re: [Bacula-users] Always upgrade Incremental to Full. Why

2006-12-14 Thread Kamen Medarski
Yes it's my delusion. A little while after sending previous mail, i downed on me that situatiation like this may appear. Thank's for all of you a lot. Cheers. - Всички гледат! Гледай и ти! www.neterra.tv/bg

Re: [Bacula-users] Always upgrade Incremental to Full. Why

2006-12-14 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kamen Medarski wrote: > I 've been made a error while implementing job section. Into my > previuos config i was defined separate jobs for full and incremental > job, and for that reason bacula was trying to upgrade incrementall to > full, because na

Re: [Bacula-users] Always upgrade Incremental to Full. Why

2006-12-14 Thread Kamen Medarski
I 've been made a error while implementing job section. Into my previuos config i was defined separate jobs for full and incremental job, and for that reason bacula was trying to upgrade incrementall to full, because names of jobs are different. But why, i'm wondering, why job name should be

Re: [Bacula-users] Always upgrade Incremental to Full. Why

2006-12-13 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 12/13/2006 4:54 PM, Kamen Medarski wrote: > I have a strange situation here. I can't find any reason why bacula > always try to upgrade scheduled or even manualy runed incremental job. > Full job appear to be done without errors for any client, but next > incremental job was upgraded to

[Bacula-users] Always upgrade Incremental to Full. Why

2006-12-13 Thread Kamen Medarski
I have a strange situation here. I can't find any reason why bacula always try to upgrade scheduled or even manualy runed incremental job. Full job appear to be done without errors for any client, but next incremental job was upgraded to full without any clue. I've made triple check to configur