-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kamen Medarski wrote:
> I 've been made a error while implementing job section. Into my
> previuos config i was defined separate jobs for full and incremental
> job, and for that reason bacula was trying to upgrade incrementall to
> full, because names of jobs are different. But why, i'm wondering, why
> job name should be the same for jobs, this dosen't make sense for me,
> but it's my opinion.
If the jobs weren't the same, how would Bacula know for which job the
Incremental applies? You might think it is logical if you have only one
job doing full and one doing incremental backups but as soon as you add
another job doing full backups, it becomes difficult to find out to
which the incremental should apply. (It would certainly be possible by
comparing clients, filesets etc etc, but certainly a lot of code would
go into that)
Greetings,
Michel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
iD8DBQFFgT8e2Vs+MkscAyURAsa3AJ0WhWvF0TSShPSafyZ8KwQW18hEsQCg5isl
LeyNW5K9UAZZtXT+iGVvXb8=
=HjOd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
