Hello Eric,
Great job!
wt., 30 sie 2022 o 09:30 Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel <
bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> napisał(a):
>
> 2. Bacula Binaries
> 3. Windows Binaries
> 4. macOS Binaries
>
>
Just a sake of curiosity, in terms of Bacula Community migration to GitLab
- do you plan to intr
Hello Wanderlei,
There's nothing to worry about the Debian repository you've mentioned
If you you compare with a "standard" Debian repo, the major difference is
that Bacula version and your personal "key" has been added to the url.
Nothing much more.
Debian Stretch repository
http://ftp.ch.debia
Hello Kern
Can you take a look in the debian repo.
It looks that the debian directory are "duplicated" (too many folders
comparing with centos repository)
Debian:
http://bacula.org/packages/X/debs/9.0.8/stretch/amd64/dists/stretch/main/binary-amd64/
CentOS
http://bacula.org/packages/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2014 06:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05
On 10/29/2014 02:02 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
>>> Hello,
>>>
I have posted a Bacula S
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
>>> Hello,
>>>
I have posted
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >Hello,
> >
> >>I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
> >>It discuss
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> Hello,
>
>> I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
>> It discusses the following items:
>>
>> 1. Bacula Release Status
>>
>> 2. Windows Binar
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
> I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
> It discusses the following items:
>
> 1. Bacula Release Status
>
> 2. Windows Binaries
>
Hmm.. so there are no "community" windows binaries any
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino
>> wrote:
>>> I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
>>> made the necessary changes by hand. Wasn't a problem, and
On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
>> made the necessary changes by hand. Wasn't a problem, and nothing
>> non-obvious showed up.
>>
>
> So you did not make an u
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/27/11 15:44, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Looks like the DB upgrade scripts for 5.2.0 can upgrade the DB from
>>> v5.0, but not from v5.1. I have a v13 database. I'm patching the DB
>>> manually right now, but this may leave people who'v
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 12:21:01 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > 2. New release cycle:
> > The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF
> > bacula git repository under Branch-5.1.
> >
> > We are considering to m
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> 2. New release cycle:
> The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF
> bacula git repository under Branch-5.1.
>
> We are considering to moving to a regular 6 month release cycle. The
> advantage
> o
> *** Thank you for your support of Bacula! ***
> The success of Bacula and its ongoing development depend on the vigor of our
> community. Your support takes many forms: bug reports and suggestions for new
> features, contributions of code and bug fixes, regression testing,
> documentation, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Hemant Shah wrote:
> There are ReleaseNotes with each release. That is what you should be
> reading.
>
> Surely you don't expect someone to scan a 900 page document to find
> out of there's somet
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 07.10.08 um 13:23 Uhr:
> > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:37:36 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> >
> > I personally don't find it that confusing, but am willing to admit that
> > some
> > would. So, what is the solution?
> >
> > Drop the feature?
> >
> > Change the f
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 07.10.08 um 13:00 Uhr:
> >
> > I voted for putting it into the Exclude section because this
> > directive is about *excluding* directories from the backup.
>
> True, but...
>
> > So if
> > someone uses this d
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:37:36 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> On Monday 06 October 2008 22:04:39 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> > >
> > > On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Not sure if this h
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:59:48 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer said:
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
> * Martin Simmons schrieb am 06.10.08 um 22:04 Uhr:
> >
> > If it hasn't been done already, it could be useful to consider how this
> > affects the mental model that users have of the include
On Monday 06 October 2008 22:04:39 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
> > > or so, so am still
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 06.10.08 um 22:04 Uhr:
>
> If it hasn't been done already, it could be useful to consider how this
> affects the mental model that users have of the include/exclude algorithm
> (which is already a source of some difficulty). This applies to the fstypes
> and drivetypes
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
> > or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > > It is not too la
On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
> or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
Yes.
>
> > It is not too late to change the name of the directive, but I would like
> > to see some discussion
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
> It is not too late to change the name of the directive, but I would like to
> see some discussion/input on this. Although I don't have any strong
> attachment to "Ignor
Thanks -- your testing is much appreciated.
Regards,
Kern
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> I would appreciate if beta testers would retest the current SVN.
>> Thanks.
>
> Other than weird-files2 (known glitch due to cp deficiency) it passes
> everything fine on Mac OS 10.4. Also passes everything on
On Thursday 19 April 2007 17:55, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > As an example of what I am lamenting here is that there is a Win 2003 bug
open
> > since 20 March where restore of encrypted (and compressed if I remember
> > right) data fails. Another example is that despite my r
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:14, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi, again,
>
> On 4/19/2007 12:10 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> ...
> > 4. I am no longer personally going to maintain the projects list (Feature
> > Requests). If someone wants to pick up maintaining it including the
voting,
> > I would be ve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 2:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Robert Nelson; 'Shane Coughlan'; 'bacula-users'
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status -- change of
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:26, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Comments inline below
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:10 AM
> > To: bacula-devel; bacula-users
> > Cc: Sha
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:47, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> Another thought as I read back through...
>
> On 4/19/07, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > My solution to this problem is several fold:
> >
> > 1. As of release 2.2.0, Win32, Solaris, and FreeBSD will no longer
> > be "of
Another thought as I read back through...
On 4/19/07, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> My solution to this problem is several fold:
>
> 1. As of release 2.2.0, Win32, Solaris, and FreeBSD will no longer
> be "officially" supported platforms. So that there is no misunderstanding, I
Comments inline below
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:10 AM
> To: bacula-devel; bacula-users
> Cc: Shane Coughlan
> Subject: [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status -- change of direc
Hello Landon,
On Monday 04 December 2006 05:22, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >>
> >> These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
> >> blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
> >> remaining issues
On Monday 04 December 2006 05:22, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >>
> >> These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
> >> blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
> >> remaining issues there.
> >
> >
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
remaining issues there.
OK, thanks.
I've committed rewrite of the block-preserving encryption restoration
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
Signature validation is done on what is actually written to disk
(upon restore).
On 3 Dec 2006 at 16:26, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As most of you know Bacula release version 1.40 is nearing -- it was
> originally scheduled for mid-November but delayed due to my vacation and
> several bugs.
>
> I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks like on
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release;
> >> what are the remaining blockers that yo
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release;
what are the remaining blockers that you are concerned about?
Well, for example, the digest/signature routines were p
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
> > like one major
> > new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
> > code just
> > is not s
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:23, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which
> > means that
> > if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I
> > found this
> > morning)
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
> > like one major
> > new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
> > code just
> > is not s
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which
means that
if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I
found this
morning)
If you're referring to digesting/signing sparse blocks (the change
you comm
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
like one major
new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
code just
is not stable (it doesn't pass a simple regression test), and it
affects the
Volume da
Hello,
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> 1. I have requested help setting up more community participation in testing,
> bug fixing, and builds of more platforms such as Solaris, FreeBSD, ... This
> is to ensure that all important platforms are supported better than I could
> do alone.
46 matches
Mail list logo
