Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BLOCK issue where already created volumes not being read

2009-02-13 Thread Thomas Traeger
Arno Lehmann schrieb: > Hi, > > 13.02.2009 02:06, Steve Handy wrote: > >> Its still open source. So that free lunch may give you tommy ache. >> > > I really didn't want to add anything else to this thread, but... > > The "free lunch" doesn't give any tummy ache to, for example, the Bank >

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Developer coordination

2007-06-28 Thread Thomas Traeger
Kern Sibbald schrieb: > If you are familar with RT, I would appreciate hearing your comments about > this proposal. If you are not familar with RT, you might want to take a look > at their site, though reading their documentation and viewing their > screenshots is not quite the same as using th

Re: [Bacula-users] Copying backups from Disk to Tape

2007-06-27 Thread Thomas Traeger
> Also, tortoise is windows only IIRC, and I'd need something really > simple for a terminal session on linux. Actually, I think using the > command line tools is the best approach for me, but that requires me > to understand things first :-) > this may help ;o) http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/

Re: [Bacula-users] backup on 64 bit machine, restore on 32 bit machine = chaos?

2007-06-01 Thread Thomas Traeger
Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> I can not confirm this, I also use 1.38.11 on 64bit and 32bit systems. I >> restored a large 64bit oracle database to a 32 bit system without a >> problem, at least there where no problem with bacula. Oracle had more, >>

Re: [Bacula-users] backup on 64 bit machine, restore on 32 bit machine = chaos?

2007-05-31 Thread Thomas Traeger
I can not confirm this, I also use 1.38.11 on 64bit and 32bit systems. I restored a large 64bit oracle database to a 32 bit system without a problem, at least there where no problem with bacula. Oracle had more, but solveable problems I think there must be some other thing in your environme

Re: [Bacula-users] Server Crash on SLES 10

2006-11-11 Thread Thomas Traeger
Kern Sibbald wrote: > As Arno pointed out this is probably a SuSE kernel problem. From the output > you have posted above, it looks identical to the problem that I reported to > them. > > I resolved the problem here by upgrading to their 10.2 kernel. > > My reading of the situation based on incom

Re: [Bacula-users] Data transfer rates

2006-11-11 Thread Thomas Traeger
> Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the > busiest, my front end web server and my mail gateways (Av and spam > filtering). > > That is certainly something to look further into. I could try turning > off compression for one cycle to prove the theory. > > Thanks,

[Bacula-users] Server Crash on SLES 10

2006-11-08 Thread Thomas Traeger
Hello list, Tonight we experienced a server crash during the bacula backup. The last messages from bacula (captured after reboot in bconsole): 03-Nov 00:43 pdc02-sd: backup_ora01.2006-11-02_21.15.02 Error: block.c:538 Write error at 303:4210 on device "Quantum_SDLT320" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Device

[Bacula-users] Server Crash on SLES 10

2006-11-07 Thread Thomas Traeger
Hello list, I posted this before but as I was no member of bacula-users it did not (yet) go through the moderator filter. We are using bacula for around 9 months now and are so far very happy with it. 2 weeks ago we installed bacula on a new server, a Fujitsu Siemens RX300R3, the jukebox is sti