I can not confirm this, I also use 1.38.11 on 64bit and 32bit systems. I
restored a large 64bit oracle database to a 32 bit system without a
problem, at least there where no problem with bacula. Oracle had more,
but solveable problems....
I think there must be some other thing in your environment that does not
work as expected.
Regards,
Thomas
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> can anyboby please confirm / correcxt the folloing assumptions:
>
> Szenario: Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006),
> FD running on a x86_64 system (and compiled for 64 bit)
> DIR running on a 386 system (32 bit)
>
> Tested: Backup and restore on the x86_64 work fine
>
> Now, after a hardware crash, I tried to restore a backup written by
> the 64 bit FD on a 32 bit system. This resulted in serious chaos:
>
> - lots of error messages like these:
>
> sisyphus-fd: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 94600 2006-12-29 10:57:49
> /restore/FULL/boot/memtest86+-1.65
> 30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337
> File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/memtest86+-1.65 not correct.
> Original 94600, restored 160136.
> sisyphus-fd: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 98989 2007-01-19 12:32:42
> /restore/FULL/boot/symvers-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.gz
> 30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337
> File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/symvers-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.gz
> not correct. Original 98989, restored 295597.
> sisyphus-fd: -rw------- 1 root root 1568757 2007-01-19 12:32:56
> /restore/FULL/boot/initrd-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.img
> 30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337
> File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/initrd-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.img
> not correct. Original 1568757, restored 3272693.
> sisyphus-fd: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 642376 2007-04-18 18:13:35
> /restore/FULL/boot/xen-syms-2.6.20-1.2944.fc6
> 30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337
> File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/xen-syms-2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 not
> correct. Original 642376, restored 1232200.
> ...
>
> - the restored files often contained wrong data; it looks as if the
> data were correct, but did belong to other file names
>
>
> Is it correct to assume that there is a general incompatibility of 32
> and 64 bit systems in that old version of Bacula?
>
> I've seen comments ("The database Id records should be 32/64 bit
> independent now.") about new features in 1.40.0, so can I assume that
> this problem has been fixed for the 2.x releases?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
