Hi,
I am currently in the process of updating to bacula version 2.0.3 on
CentOS 4.
In a first step I wanted to update my database and in a second step the
rpm. Unfourtunately the package bacula-updatedb-2.0.3-1.i386.rpm only
contains update scripts up to version 9, not from version 9 to 10.
Data
On 2006-08-23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use bacula 1.38.11 on Debian Sarge with a LTO2 drive.
>
> Sometimes I have to run backup during the day and I use software
> compression, so it sucks all the vital essence of the server CPU and
> affects samba performances. My question is :
Hi,
after having installed version bacula-sqlite-1.38.11 on CentOS 4.3 the
first backup job failed with the following log:
---
21-Aug 21:00 ercws207-dir: Start Backup JobId
546,Job=StandardSicherung.2006-08-21_21.00.03
21-Aug 21:00 ercws207-dir: Purging oldest volume "Tag-01"
21-Aug 21:00 ercws2
Hi,
I just installed the prebuild sqlite-rpms for version 1.38.11 on a
Centos 4 machine and experienced problems with the database scripts in
/etc/bacula.
There seems to be a problem with path reference at least in the
following scripts: make_catalog_backup, make_sqlite_tables,
create_sqlite_data
On 2006-04-10, Mark Nienberg wrote:
>
> How is your method different from the Daily, Weekly, Monthly Tape Usage
> Example in the Bacula Documentation?
>
1. The scheduling is different. In Bacula you cannot schedule on the
last workday of a month or week because Bacula doesn't know of workdays
a
Hi,
I have created a small howto covering GFS rotation scheme and bacula
together with some supplemental scripts.
The GFS rotation scheme might not be useful for all scenarios
(personally I think its only applicable in small environments), but I
use it since over 10 years for a site, first with o
On 2006-03-03, Georg Lutz wrote:
> A "unset LOCAL" before calling the bsmtp binary should fix this.
>
I meant "unset LANG", of course.
--
Georg
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scrip
On 2006-02-06, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2/6/2006 11:11 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >I use a Bacula feature to send me an email when a backup is done. The
> >mail is sent to me but with a date of 01-01-1970 (the date of the smtp
> >server seems good). I use Baucla 1.38.5.
> >
On 2006-02-26, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> I just noticed that the directive LabelFormat is deprecated in 1.38 -
> at least according to the manual:
> "Please note that this directive is deprecated and is replaced in
> version 1.37 and greater with a Python script for creating volume
> names."
Does
On 2006-01-06, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > ---
> > $ rpm -K bacula-1.38.3-1.src.rpm
> > bacula-1.38.3-1.src.rpm: sha1 MD5 NOT OK
>
> You did a good thing here, because it appears that the uploaded file was
> truncated by about 2MB and hence was not good.
>
> > ---
> >
> > BTW: What are the steps t
On 2006-01-05, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Earlier today, I released Bacula version 1.38.3 to Source Forge. You can
> find
> the following packages:
>
Hi Kern,
there is a problem with the rpm file. I tried it from several different
mirrors, each time with the same result:
---
$ rpm -K
On 2005-10-03, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> >What can I do now? Bacula thinks that there is a tape Monat-0003. I
> >suppose I have to tweak the database manually (delete Monat-0003).
> >
>
> You can either mark that volume as Used or, better, Error. Or you can
> delete it from the catalog: delete med
Hi,
is it normal, that with autolabeling function (option "Label Format"), a
database entry for the tape is created even if no tape has been labeled
physically?
We always use new tapes for our monthly backups for archival purposes. I
set up an appropriate monthly pool. Last night the monthly back
On 2005-08-01, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >
> > To "enforce" the policy I set Maximum Volume Job to 2 (Backup plus
> > catalog) and Accept Any Volume to no.
>
> Hm. I don't see how having "Accept Any Volume" disabled would do
> anything to enforce that policy that could not be better enforced by
>
On 2005-07-26, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>
> Well, I suppose that so long as you don't have a limited volume use
> count or volume use window, then provided you have Use Any Volume
> enabled and you know about how much data you're expecting to back up,
> the output of List Volumes should be able t
On 2005-07-26, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Roland Arendes wrote:
>
> >The 'status dir' output is a good guess anyway, if I remember correctly.
>
> It only shows the guess for the next tape.
>
Yes, and you can use it only when you schedule the job.
In our case the internal schedule
Hi,
at our the site the backup operator has to know in advance which tape he
has to insert in the drive for next backup. The backup tool we used so
far, was able to display the backup tape which will be used next for a
particular pool.
This function is absolutely essential for us, because when ba
On 2005-07-11, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> > Can the bacula-rpm be rebuilt to either use the existing sqlite-RPM or
> > use it's own sqlite that doesn't conflict with the sqlite-package? (The
> > current version's filenames shouldn't conflict anyway however the
> > Conflicts-tag prevents from install
Hi,
I have created the following job:
---
Job {
Name = "StandardSicherung"
Client = ercws207-fd
Type = Backup
Level = Full # oder Differential, wird beim Sichern aufgerufen
FileSet = StandardFileSet
Pool = MonatsBaender # oder TagesBaender, wird beim Sichern aufgerufen
#Storage = "D
Hi,
why is there a conflict in the specfile between sqlite and
bacula-sqlite?
This means, that I cannot have sqlite installed, when choosing sqlite as
underlaying database for bacula ?!?
--
Georg
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover E
20 matches
Mail list logo
