On 2005-07-11, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > Can the bacula-rpm be rebuilt to either use the existing sqlite-RPM or > > use it's own sqlite that doesn't conflict with the sqlite-package? (The > > current version's filenames shouldn't conflict anyway however the > > Conflicts-tag prevents from installing both packages. > > Bacula 1.36.x does not work with SQLite 3.x. Bacula 1.37.x does work with > it, but I recommend against it because SQLite 3.x in my tests seems to be 4 > to 10 times slower than SQLite 2.8.x > > SQLite 2.x and 3.x are designed to be installed on your system at the same > time without conflicts -- providing it is done correctly of course. >
Would it not be better and safer in that case to statically link sqlite into bacula? At the moment bacula-sqlite prevents me from install any other programs which need sqlite ... -- Georg ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
