John Drescher escribió:
> On 8/23/07, Angel Mieres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Im testing bacula with two jobs. One of them, backup over 70.000 files
>> and have 2 Gb. Second one have over 100 files and have 1Gb.
>> Why the first jo
Diference between SCP and bacula goes from 15 min with bacula and 3 min
with scp.
I suspect it's some database problem. Im using postgresql 7.4.8. Maybe
with Sqlite will increase the rates? Must I try with them?
MaxxAtWork escribió:
> On 8/23/07, Angel Mieres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Rich escribió:
> On 2007.08.23. 14:51, Angel Mieres wrote:
>
>> I will try to answer all things that you said friends.
>> - I don't use compression method to do a backup.
>> - The database is postgres and during backup isn't taking all CPU or
>> memory
I will try to answer all things that you said friends.
- I don't use compression method to do a backup.
- The database is postgres and during backup isn't taking all CPU or
memory, only a 10% CPU. Process like bacula-fd/sd/dir exactly the same.
- Im not backing up to a tape, the two backups are fr
Hi all,
Im testing bacula with two jobs. One of them, backup over 70.000 files
and have 2 Gb. Second one have over 100 files and have 1Gb.
Why the first job is getting speed of 3.000 KB/sec and the second one
25.000 KB/sec?(the backup is to a file on both cases)
Have bacula less performance with s
Which will be the speed of a backup, having in mind that i have SATA
disks and a tape that's could run to 8 Kb/s?
Im having this speed:
17000KB/s from SATA to tape
35000KB/s from SATA(data) to SATA(data-stored by bacula)
Is this normal? or im doing some wrong?
-
>> I have to label all volumes first time use a new tape cartridge?
>> Or with the autolabel & automount feature this happen automatically?
>>
>>
> A tape needs to be labeled to be used but autolabel can do that for you.
>
>> If then, how could do this easily for 42 cartridge? :S
>>
>>
>> I have to label all volumes first time use a new tape cartridge?
>> Or with the autolabel & automount feature this happen automatically?
>>
>>
> A tape needs to be labeled to be used but autolabel can do that for you.
>
>> If then, how could do this easily for 42 cartridge? :S
>>
>>
Hi,
I have to label all volumes first time use a new tape cartridge?
Or with the autolabel & automount feature this happen automatically?
If then, how could do this easily for 42 cartridge? :S
Thx in advance
--
Angel Mieres - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas
ENEO Tecnologi
I want to know if is possible have bacula working with a library tape, 2
jobs at the same time working for a drive each one.
If possible it would be great if could give me the keys to get it in solve.
Thx in advance.
Cheers.
---
John Drescher escribió:
>> I have an autochanger (IBM TS3200) and have some problems to set up them
>> with bacula.
>> The robot appears to be /dev/sg4, and it show me that i have 2 drives, 4
>> magazines and some IBM labels:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bacula-2.0.3/etc # mtx -f /dev/sg4 sta
Hi all,
I have an autochanger (IBM TS3200) and have some problems to set up them
with bacula.
The robot appears to be /dev/sg4, and it show me that i have 2 drives, 4
magazines and some IBM labels:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bacula-2.0.3/etc # mtx -f /dev/sg4 status
Storage Changer /dev/sg4:2
12 matches
Mail list logo