Re: [Bacula-users] Verify jobs and "Warning: sql_get.c:186 More than one Filename!"

On 12/17/21 05:16, Mark Dixon wrote: Hi all, I find the verify job feature of bacula really useful to see what has changed since the last verifyinit job, but the job output is becoming difficult to read as it's clustered with lots and lots of messages of the form: 17-Dec 18:28 foo-dir JobId 676

Re: [Bacula-users] Documentation MaximumVolumes Inaccuracy Bacula Manual 11

Hello Martin, > I think the doc is correct because "forcibly purging" only happens if you set > the Purge Oldest Volume or Recycle Oldest Volume directives to yes. The > purging you are seeing below happens because the volume has no current jobs > (e.g. they were pruned) so that is normal recycli

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

On 12/17/2021 11:30 am, Heitor Faria wrote: Hello Large, I'll send to bacula-devel. (FTR: I'm a Site Reliability Engineer for a LARGE travel company by day, and have been in IT for >40 years in support/ops). Such a large company chooses to not pay for a backup supported software and to repl

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Large, > I'll send to bacula-devel. > (FTR: I'm a Site Reliability Engineer for a LARGE travel company by day, > and have been in > IT for >40 years in support/ops). Such a large company chooses to not pay for a backup supported software and to reply on the community? IMHO it tells me how

Re: [Bacula-users] Documentation MaximumVolumes Inaccuracy Bacula Manual 11

I think the doc is correct because "forcibly purging" only happens if you set the Purge Oldest Volume or Recycle Oldest Volume directives to yes. The purging you are seeing below happens because the volume has no current jobs (e.g. they were pruned) so that is normal recycling. __Martin > O

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

On 12/17/2021 11:03 am, Heitor Faria wrote: Hello Larry, I set all the volretentions to zero in the Database. I'd love some direction from dev or someone else. I'd also be willing to give access. I'm not sure if you understand how GPL licensing works, but it is a software that comes with no

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Larry, > I set all the volretentions to zero in the Database. > > I'd love some direction from dev or someone else. > > I'd also be willing to give access. I'm not sure if you understand how GPL licensing works, but it is a software that comes with no support or warranties. What I mean,

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

On 12/17/2021 10:28 am, Heitor Faria wrote: Hello Larry, That was called out in the 11 release notes as letting the JOB retentions determine volume retentions. Did I misread something? That was new with 11. I wasn't aware of this new feature. Thanks for pointing out. Most likely, your probl

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Larry, > That was called out in the 11 release notes as letting the JOB > retentions > determine volume retentions. > > Did I misread something? That was new with 11. I wasn't aware of this new feature. Thanks for pointing out. Most likely, your problem now is that these volumes were crea

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

On 12/17/2021 9:56 am, Heitor Faria wrote: Hello Larry, Your jobs do not show the need for a new volume. However, your configuration does not look good: "Pool { Name = Default Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle Volumes AutoPrune =

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Larry, Your jobs do not show the need for a new volume. However, your configuration does not look good: "Pool { Name = Default Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle Volumes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volum

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Larry, > I can re-send all my configs if needed, as well as give access to the > server. Please show your configurations, and also a full job log where a new volume is created. Regards, -- MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA) Bacula LATAM CEO mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 mobile2: + 55 61 98268-

[Bacula-users] Documentation MaximumVolumes Inaccuracy Bacula Manual 11

Hello All, According to the Thread "[Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?" and to the documentation: : "A few points to keep in mind: If a pool doesn't have maximum volumes defined then Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

On 12/17/2021 2:45 am, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: Hello Larry, did you remember to "update pools" after you made the changes to the pool definition (maximum volumes) or did you include those from the get-go? Taking a look at the pool definition in the DB itself might shed some light on the issue as w

Re: [Bacula-users] New Bacula Server with multiple disks

On 12/16/21 19:39, mac-eduki2.co.uk wrote: Hi Josh Thank you for your reply, advice and link. This is a remote server and as I do not need long term storage of backups it is really for disaster recovery - it is also not located anywhere near the clients. My hope is that if it does crash I wil

[Bacula-users] Verify jobs and "Warning: sql_get.c:186 More than one Filename!"

Hi all, I find the verify job feature of bacula really useful to see what has changed since the last verifyinit job, but the job output is becoming difficult to read as it's clustered with lots and lots of messages of the form: 17-Dec 18:28 foo-dir JobId 67663: Warning: sql_get.c:186 More th

Re: [Bacula-users] Why isn't bacula recycling these volumes?

Hello Larry, did you remember to "update pools" after you made the changes to the pool definition (maximum volumes) or did you include those from the get-go? Taking a look at the pool definition in the DB itself might shed some light on the issue as well. What happens if you manually prune / purg