> Last month I upgraded to Bacula 9.2.2. Backups worked without error but
> I noticed "list volumes" reporting a 25 TB volume (not 6 TB as usual). A
> subsequent test restore failed due to a volume data error.
>
> Downgrading back to Bacula 7.4.5 did not resolve the issue.
It sounds then like thi
I used Bacula 7.4.5 successfully for around 2 years with an IBM
ULTRIUM-HH7 SAS drive and FlexStor II autoloader (Neoseries) on Arch
Linux. Backups and restores worked perfectly.
Last month I upgraded to Bacula 9.2.2. Backups worked without error but
I noticed "list volumes" reporting a 25 TB volu
On 28.12.18 19:07, Dante F. B. Colò wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> In my case m using CentOS 7 , i tried compiled Bacula with libs3
> available on epel repository which is even older than this branch you
> mencioned but it fails to build , i''l try with the version available on
> your repo.
Hi Sven
Thanks for your reply,
In my case m using CentOS 7 , i tried compiled Bacula with libs3
available on epel repository which is even older than this branch you
mencioned but it fails to build , i''l try with the version available on
your repo. Thank you !
On 27/12/18 18:18, Sven Har
