Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.2.0 and error updating file digest

2015-12-24 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 12/25/2015 01:33 AM, Peter Keller wrote: > Hello, > >> 23-Dec 18:47 DIR:xxx.yyy.zzz JobId 4: Error: Catalog error updating file >> digest. bdb.h:101 Update failed: affected_rows=0 for UPDATE File SET >> MD5='oGhRwHZ+y+mWb+fv9ppFrA' WHERE FileId=6148914691236517205 > Also, I just noticed, 6148914

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.2.0 and error updating file digest

2015-12-24 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Thanks for pointing out the misleading information in the manual. That particular paragraph is very old (version 1.39.28 dates from *many* years ago). I will update it to refer to "50GB or larger". I will also correct the sentence about Bacula not being able to seek -- it in fact does se

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about versions to be installed in an Linux / Windows environment

2015-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
On 24/12/15 16:01, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hi Daniel Hi, Wanderlei > Please, read the release notes about bacula and take your conclusions! > http://blog.bacula.org/category/releases/ Thank you! I'll be taking a look! Best regards, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about versions to be installed in an Linux / Windows environment

2015-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Bryn. On 24/12/15 14:17, Bryn Hughes wrote: >> Thanks for your answers and for the considerations mentioned about the >> versions. >> >> Greg, you mention having compiled the SD on Jessie, but I guess you've >> also compiled the Director, right? Since both must have the same >> version. Thoug

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.2.0 and error updating file digest

2015-12-24 Thread Peter Keller
Hello, > 23-Dec 18:47 DIR:xxx.yyy.zzz JobId 4: Error: Catalog error updating file > digest. bdb.h:101 Update failed: affected_rows=0 for UPDATE File SET > MD5='oGhRwHZ+y+mWb+fv9ppFrA' WHERE FileId=6148914691236517205 Also, I just noticed, 6148914691236517205 is 0x in Hex, which is

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.2.0 and error updating file digest

2015-12-24 Thread Peter Keller
On 12/24/2015 02:16 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Well, 4GB Volume size seems very small to me. I would start with > something like 50GB and possibly make them bigger if there are more than > a few thousand Volumes. The manual is sometimes ambiguous about things like a good Volume size. I chose 4GB b

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.2.0 and error updating file digest

2015-12-24 Thread Kern Sibbald
Well, 4GB Volume size seems very small to me. I would start with something like 50GB and possibly make them bigger if there are more than a few thousand Volumes. The error: 23-Dec 18:47 DIR:xxx.yyy.zzz JobId 4: Error: Catalog error updating file digest. bdb.h:101 Update failed: affected_rows=0 f

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about versions to be installed in an Linux / Windows environment

2015-12-24 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
Hi Daniel Please, read the release notes about bacula and take your conclusions! http://blog.bacula.org/category/releases/ Best Regards Wanderlei 2015-12-24 15:17 GMT-02:00 Bryn Hughes : > On 2015-12-24 07:34 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > Hi Wanderlei and Greg. > > > > On 23/12/15 15:34, Greg W

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about versions to be installed in an Linux / Windows environment

2015-12-24 Thread Bryn Hughes
On 2015-12-24 07:34 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Hi Wanderlei and Greg. > > On 23/12/15 15:34, Greg Woods wrote: > >>> am thinking of using Debian Jessie which includes Bacula 5.2.6 in its >>> repository for director and storage daemon. But I remember a few cases >>> where I have experie

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about versions to be installed in an Linux / Windows environment

2015-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi Wanderlei and Greg. On 23/12/15 15:34, Greg Woods wrote: > >am thinking of using Debian Jessie which includes Bacula 5.2.6 in its > >repository for director and storage daemon. But I remember a few cases > >where I have experienced incompatibilities if the client versions are > >