Hello Carlo!
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Carlo Filippetto <
carlo.filippe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-05-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Ana Emília M. Arruda :
>
>> "The new copies can not be used for restoration unless you specifically
>> choose them by JobId."
>
>
> I read it, but propably I don't u
On 18.05.2015 08:28, Luc Van der Veken
wrote:
Hi,Kern,
Do you mean that exactly as you say it, “FD
that is more recent that the Dir and the SD […] is a big
problem”?
Hi all,
I want to use copy job to copy volumes to a secondary site used as disaster
recovery.
Can I use this copy job to restore a server in the second site?
Can I use Copy Job create Virtual Full Backup?
Thank you
--
One
On 05/18/2015 12:27 PM, Florian Rist wrote:
> The whole thing about costs probably seams to be a bit ridiculous, but
> unfortunately there is niter money nor understanding for the need here
> right now. So I'm trying to figure out a cheap way to get to a working
> system that can be handled som
2015-05-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Ana Emília M. Arruda :
> "The new copies can not be used for restoration unless you specifically
> choose them by JobId."
I read it, but propably I don't undertand it in the correct way... (I'm
Italian)
I read that I can do a "restore copy" job that restore the origi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Carlo Filippetto <
carlo.filippe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice!
> but I read something that I don't like
> :(
>
> I read that the copy job is not like a normal Backup Job, it is used to
> 'restore' the original Job unless the original Job is purged (deleted), and
> i
Nice!
but I read something that I don't like
:(
I read that the copy job is not like a normal Backup Job, it is used to
'restore' the original Job unless the original Job is purged (deleted), and
in this case it is promote.
I search a solution where the secondary site may restore the Virtual
Mach
Hi Rudolf
> If you want to avoid tape back hitching, you have to have atleast:
> HP LTO-5: 47 MB/sIBM LTO-5: 40 MB/s
> HP LTO-6: 54 MB/sIBM LTO-6: 40 MB/s
>
> And I am afraid, that single 6 TB drive is not a good solution. It
> can be maybe sufficient if you first spool the data, and
You can "copy" jobs based on various criterias. You can copy all jobs that
were backed up into one specific volume, all jobs from a client, etc. There
are a few options for that. Basically, you will create a copy job that will
copy your backups based on specifically conditions from one pool (where
Thank to you!
I have another question: with the 'copy' job, SD to SD, I can copy a Volume
or I have to copy every single job?
Thank you
2015-05-18 19:04 GMT+02:00 Ana Emília M. Arruda :
> Hello Carlo,
>
> Don´t worry!
>
> About to copying only the confs and db, I was supposing that on site2
> t
Hello Carlo,
Don´t worry!
About to copying only the confs and db, I was supposing that on site2 there
would be an identical installation as it is on site1. Since clustering is
not a builtin Bacula functionality (I´m affraid there is one that I´m not
aware), I didn´t realize that it could be done
Hi Davide
> I will not advise any only-drive LTO solution: if you need to spend
> less money, you could take a look at the Tandbergdata's (opps:
> Overland) 1U storageloader with LTO4 or 5, it's very cheap.
> Any "no library" LTO solutions, will require a lot of operator work,
> it will make your
Hello,
2015-05-13 9:35 GMT+02:00 Pavel Bychikhin :
> Hi Radoslaw,
> Thank you very much for your answer.
> I have one more in this regard. Can you please clarify it for me as well.
> One of my File definitions looks like:
> File =
In this case if I add some new lines to that file, bacula wi
On 05/18/2015 10:22 AM, Davide Giunchi wrote:
> Any "no library" LTO solutions, will require a lot of operator work,
it will make your solution quite unusable.
On the subject of amazon vtl: back when they announced it, they had a
rationale write-up detailing the real costs of tape backups. Includ
> I don't have the hardware yet. My plan is to get a small cheap server,
> some low cost CPU (some i3 Core), 6 TB HD (for spooling), a SAS
> controller and a LTO 5 or 6 drive (probably from Tandberg). I'll need to
> change tapes manually, any library solution seams to be to expensive.
> Changing ta
Sorry for the delay!
>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Carlo Filippetto <
> carlo.filippe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you.
>> I will use the sd2sd solution.
>>
>>
>> 2015-05-15 15:54 GMT+02:00 Davide Giunchi :
>>
>>> problem: you need a lot of bandiwidth ( = € )! then you must keep alway
Florian Rist wrote (2015/05/17):
> I don't have the hardware yet. My plan is to get a small cheap server,
> some low cost CPU (some i3 Core), 6 TB HD (for spooling), a SAS
> controller and a LTO 5 or 6 drive (probably from Tandberg). I'll need to
> change tapes manually, any library solution sea
Hi Ana Emilia, thanks for clearing that up.
But then I think I may have a problem :(
I am using the Dir and FD from standard Ubuntu 12.04 repositories, 5.2.5.
I only have a few Windows clients. For those I got the Windows FD offered by
Bacula Systems two years ago, which was at that time 6.0.6.
On 5/14/2015 7:16 AM, kinomakino wrote:
Dear friends, first of all, thanks for everything.
Bacula infrastructure have working for my internal backups within the LAN.
Now I want to make a backup of an external VPS.
NAT have done in my LAN ports 9102 9101 9103.
He tells me not to find the DS.
in
Hello Luc,
I think there is a misunderstooding here.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Luc Van der Veken
wrote:
> Hi,Kern,
>
>
>
> Do you mean that exactly as you say it,
>
> “FD that is more recent that the Dir and the SD […] is a big problem”?
>
> I thought it was the other way around, tha
Hey Kelvin/Alex,
You could also just set postfix to send ssl/tls authenticated emails:
http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=1160
Regards,
===
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified
Administrator II
1
Yes Alan. I had suggested it and this certainly solve this issue. But we´re
trying to adjust the timeouts.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 17/05/15 02:22, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
>
> I'm aware of a case of Bacula working with an Amazon VTL service. We
>> are having
Hello Florian,
OK. So you will not need to much retention periods. With two fulls +
differentials you have enough.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Florian Rist wrote:
>
> > Your full backups could be divided into smaller ones to fill in one
> > tape.
>
> Is this something that I would have to
On 17/05/15 02:22, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> I'm aware of a case of Bacula working with an Amazon VTL service. We
> are having occasional drive timeout issues. IMHO this is causing some
> issues with tapes being unloaded to different slots than that they were
> originally.
If this is the ca
You can use swaks to send emails with ssl/tls. It's a very useful command
line utility which I have used with nagios
/usr/bin/printf "$MESSAGE$" | /usr/bin/swaks -4 --server
smtp.googlemail.com:587 --from no-re...@example.net --to
nagios-ad...@example.net -tls --auth PLAIN --auth-user no-re...@exa
Thank you both for the answer and sorry for late response. I successfuly
compiled bacula with LZO support.
The conclusion is:
To compile bacula with LZO support install LZO development libraries
(liblzo2-dev on Ubuntu) and compile bacula as usual, which means wihout
--with-lzo (this parameter
26 matches
Mail list logo
