Hi Rudolf > If you want to avoid tape back hitching, you have to have atleast: > HP LTO-5: 47 MB/s IBM LTO-5: 40 MB/s > HP LTO-6: 54 MB/s IBM LTO-6: 40 MB/s > .... > And I am afraid, that single 6 TB drive is not a good solution. It > can be maybe sufficient if you first spool the data, and then just > unspool them to the tape, or using D2D2T, but if you have spooling > and unspooling at the same time, I do not think that it will > be considerate to your tape drive.
Thanks for the numbers and pointing me to the spool/unspool problem. This can be fixed by using two hard drives, right? The whole thing about costs probably seams to be a bit ridiculous, but unfortunately there is niter money nor understanding for the need here right now. So I'm trying to figure out a cheap way to get to a working system that can be handled somehow. And I'm fully aware of the fact that the hardware investment costs will be a minor part in the actual long term overall costs. See you Flo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
