Re: [Bacula-users] file set changes with accurate mode enabled

Hello, 2015-03-23 13:58 GMT+01:00 Pavel Bychikhin : > Hello Everyone, > I apologize for repeating my question but I've searched a lot and didn't > find any clarification and, unfortunately, didn't get any answer to my > previous question. > Does the accurate mode eliminate the need of file set ch

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

Hello, 2015-05-12 10:25 GMT+02:00 Ian Young : > >> The director is running on a CentOS 6 system and claims to be Bacula >> 5.0.0. The client is CentOS 7 and Bacula 5.2.x, but looking at the jobs for >> other systems they also seem to have inconsistencies like this. >> > > It is unsupported config

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

On 05/12/2015 01:50 PM, Alex Domoradov wrote: >> Where's 23MB/s come from? > from bacula-web - http://i.imgur.com/pEQwCvI.png > >> I get 200+MB/s on disk writes to raidz zfs backed by cheap "desktop" > drives > It would depend on "type" of files as I understood. I have a lot (~11M) of > small file

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

> Where's 23MB/s come from? from bacula-web - http://i.imgur.com/pEQwCvI.png > I get 200+MB/s on disk writes to raidz zfs backed by cheap "desktop" drives It would depend on "type" of files as I understood. I have a lot (~11M) of small files 20-50 Kbyte. So I don't believe that you can get 200 Mb/

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

On 05/12/2015 01:18 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: >> No, I didn't. How can I test backup over loopback? > > Test 127.0.0.1. Doesn't matter since my guess about the network was wrong. Oh, wait, "test backup". Yeah, that may take a little more work than iperf/netcat. ;) -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

On 05/12/2015 02:55 AM, Alex Domoradov wrote: >> Run "openssl speed" then run with e.g. "ciphers = md2" on both > ends and post the difference > I have tested with RC4-MD5 cipher. The result even worse - 8 hours 30 > minutes :) Hehe. Point is, if you let endpoints autonegotiate, you've no idea wha

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 7 rpm bug (Fedora/RHEL/CentOS repo)

...and actually the font is not needed at all, on a normal desktop system that font is not required, it will use one of the other. This happens only because your system does not have any font installed due to the missing desktop. I'm adding it as a dependency anyway as it solves this particular co

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 12 May 2015, at 10:09, Alex Domoradov wrote: > > I'm using 5.2.13 on CentOS 6 form the following repo - > https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ > without any problem. > So you could try it. Thanks for the pointer.

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 7 rpm bug (Fedora/RHEL/CentOS repo)

Hello, on a freshly installed minimal CentOS 7 VM just the fonts are enough; I will add those. If you still have your old transaction available you can use the "yum history" command to remove the extra packages you installed. --Simone On 12 May 2015 at 11:23, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [Bacula-users] How to compile bacula with LZO

Below is the script that I use to "configure" the Bacula build. It automatically includes lzo if it is installed on your system: = begin script #!/bin/sh # This is Kern's configure script for Bacula PREFIX=/opt/bacula CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall" \ ./configure \ --sbindir=${PREFIX}/bin \ --

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 7 rpm bug (Fedora/RHEL/CentOS repo)

Hello, thanks for reporting! I will add them in the next few hours (currently busy at the moment). Regards, --Simone On 12 May 2015 at 01:10, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > PS. this was a fresh install of centos 7.1 x86_64. > -- > Dimitri Maziuk > Programmer/sysadmin > BioMagResBank, UW-Madison --

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> so it should be relatively easy to build a new CentOS 7 machine to get 5.2.13. I'm using 5.2.13 on CentOS 6 form the following repo - https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ without any problem. So you could try it. > On 12 May 2015, at 07:33, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > >

Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

Hello, 2015-04-26 3:44 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy : > Hey all, > > I have one host that seems to be erroring out whenever I try to take a > backup of it: > > > Running Jobs: > Console connected at 25-Apr-15 19:23 > JobId Level Name Status >

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 12 May 2015, at 07:33, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > > why does the subsequent differential not appear to include any of them, given > that it's supposed to be backing up everything changed since the last full > dump (in my case, on 2015-04-19) ? > > Well, it should. A differential b

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

> Run "openssl speed" then run with e.g. "ciphers = md2" on both ends and post the difference I have tested with RC4-MD5 cipher. The result even worse - 8 hours 30 minutes :) > How did you get the 1.5hr difference? -- 23MB/s looks like your bottleneck is the network I don't think so # iperf3 -c 7