> Run "openssl speed" then run with e.g. "ciphers = md2" on both
ends and post the difference
I have tested with RC4-MD5 cipher. The result even worse - 8 hours 30
minutes :)
> How did you get the 1.5hr difference? -- 23MB/s looks like your
bottleneck is the network
I don't think so
# iperf3 -c 78.47.xxx.xxx -t 60
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-60.00 sec 4.39 GBytes 629 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-60.00 sec 4.39 GBytes 628 Mbits/sec receiver
> did you run your first test over the loopback?
No, I didn't. How can I test backup over loopback?
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu>
wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 03:22 AM, Alex Domoradov wrote:
> > Maybe someone would be interesting. I made test with stunnel yesterday
> and
> > ... the results almost the same.
>
> <shrug/> Run "openssl speed" then run with e.g. "ciphers = md2" on both
> ends and post the difference. Repeat with e.g. "ciphers = ghash"
> ("ciphers = none" should get you even closer).
>
> How did you get the 1.5hr difference? -- 23MB/s looks like your
> bottleneck is the network, did you run your first test over the loopback?
>
> --
> Dimitri Maziuk
> Programmer/sysadmin
> BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
