On 05/12/2015 02:55 AM, Alex Domoradov wrote: >> Run "openssl speed" then run with e.g. "ciphers = md2" on both > ends and post the difference > I have tested with RC4-MD5 cipher. The result even worse - 8 hours 30 > minutes :)
Hehe. Point is, if you let endpoints autonegotiate, you've no idea what it is you're testing. Worst part: they may autonegotiate on a different cipher next time. >> How did you get the 1.5hr difference? -- 23MB/s looks like your > bottleneck is the network > I don't think so Bottleneck: by solving one you create another. ;) Where's 23MB/s come from? I get 200+MB/s on disk writes to raidz zfs backed by cheap "desktop" drives: that not what you'd call fast storage. I can't really see your disk writes being 10 times slower than that. >> did you run your first test over the loopback? > No, I didn't. How can I test backup over loopback? Test 127.0.0.1. Doesn't matter since my guess about the network was wrong. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
