Hi,
I use RHEL4.0 ES x86_64, is there any binaries package for it ?
I'm not a Redhat wizard at all, I usually run Debian ;)
Thanks in advance, Adam.
Felix Schwarz a écrit :
> Adam Cécile schrieb:
>
>> I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
>> I saw fschwarz announce but can'
Dave schrieb:
> I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
> machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
> rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
> any help appreciated.
The fastest method getting a Cent
Adam Cécile schrieb:
> I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
> I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
What distribution do you use?
For Fedora {6,7} you can just do "yum install bacula-client" (do "yum search
bacula" to see the other available packages).
For
>I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
> machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
> rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
> any help appreciated.
>
I built it on CentOS5 using CentOS4 option. Wo
Hi Arno,
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:18:49 am Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 10.09.2007 02:23,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> > Arno,
> >
> > On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> On a related issue:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we did our test:
>
> - first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
> to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
> jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger)
I already have recycle=yes in each of my pools, and I'm running LVM and
have extended the volume as much as I have space for. But I still ended
up running out of space, largely because I messed with some of the file
set definitions that triggered new full backups. So...
I've already done prun
Hi,
I am trying to build static bacula 2.2.3 client on Mac OS X 10.3 (Apple XCode
Tools 1.5 with November 2004 gcc update installed) for distributing among
older Macs still in use here. I am having the following errors from ld while
executing make command (see below). As far as I know crt0.o is
Hello,
we did our test:
- first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed as usual with
missing files and error messages that some restored files have larg
Hello again Arno,
Today I just pulled down Kern's update to Bacula (version 2.2.3) and I
installed it effortlessly on my Xserve. I am running all three Bacula
daemons on the same Xserve machine. I edited the bconsole.conf file (to
change its "address" field by changing its value to the static IP a
On Monday 10 September 2007 22:08, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> I have the regress.tar.gz from 2.0.3 if you need it. I'm not sure if
> that helps or not.
Yes, could you email it to me off list. That would save me the trouble of
tracking it down.
Many thanks.
Kern
>
> =R
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2007 08:35, James Harper wrote:
>>>
>> >From Debian (the only distribution I'm really familiar with):
>> >From Debian (the only distribution I'm really familiar with):
>>
>> Sarge (oldstable) - 1.36.2
>> Sar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have the regress.tar.gz from 2.0.3 if you need it. I'm not sure if
that helps or not.
=R
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have released 2.0.3-restore.patch to the bacula-patches 2.0.3 download area
> of Source Forge. This patch fixes bug #935
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, but I'm running Bacula 2.2.1 (granted
I see that 2.2.3 just came out today so I'll download and install to see how
it works), but after going through the Bacula Tutorial (and I'm using
PostgreSQL 8.1.9), running drop_bacula_tables (after I had succe
On 10 Sep 2007 at 13:43, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
> > and
> > SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
> > other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, M
On 9/9/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 10.09.2007 05:12,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
> > Hello,
> >
> > In Chapter 6.3.4 of the Bacula User's Guide, with regard to naming
> > resources, the Guide states that:
> >
> > Each of your Bacula components must have a unique name.
> >
So, I have been playing with cloning and I have it working, where i have
a job that sends the clone to a volume in a different pool using the
line below in a job directive, and that seems to work ok.
Run = "host1 level=$l since=\"$s\" Pool=DefaultClone"
The schedule for this job is a Full on fr
Hello,
I have released 2.0.3-restore.patch to the bacula-patches 2.0.3 download area
of Source Forge. This patch fixes bug #935 (failure to restore files) here.
However, please test it carefully as it is not as well tested as the fixes to
version 2.2.x
I recommend that if at all possible to
Michael Patzer wrote:
> thx for the -f hint. it looks like an endless loop...
>
> [pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
> temporarily unavailable)
> [pid 21593] select(6, NULL, [5], [5], {10, 0}) = 1 (left {10, 0})
It looks like the same symptoms are present in the regress
On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
> and
> SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
> other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X).
Only the 2drive-3pool-disk failed on FreeBSD 7.
On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
> and
> SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
> other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X).
Bacula 2.2.3 has been committed to the FreeBSD
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 18:19 Uhr:
> Marc Schiffbauer a écrit :
> > * Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
> >> I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
> >>
> >> Help would be
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.09.07 um 18:49 Uhr:
> On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > >>> At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unles
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>> At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
> >>> there is some really compelling reason to create on
Hello,
A bit earlier today, I released version 2.2.3 source tar files and the Win32
binaries to the Bacula release area of Source Forge. This release was almost
ready to fix some minor problems with version 2.2.2 when bug #935 was found
so we were able to quickly include a confirmed fix for th
Marc Schiffbauer a écrit :
> * Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
>> I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
>>
>> Help would be appreciated.
>>
>
> You should wait until bacula 2.2.3 is rea
Resent to both bacula-users and bacula-devel.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
On 10 Sep 2007 at 17:59, Benjamin E. Zeller wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007 13:54:17 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have bui
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:58, user100 wrote:
> > Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in
> > the Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons
> > (or the Director).
>
> Should the patch fix the "auto-restore" of previous backups too or
On Monday 23 April 2007 13:54:17 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have built a couple of bacula deb-packages based on the debian SID
> packages.
>
> Thanks to John Goerzen for that great work!
>
> My packages are backports of these packages and are available
> through our PackMan repository
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
> I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
>
> Help would be appreciated.
You should wait until bacula 2.2.3 is realeased which fixes a
serious restore bug. Kern ha
Hi,
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
Help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
--
Adam CECILELinbox / Free&ALter Soft
152 rue de Grigy tél: +33 3 87 50 87 95
Technopôle Metz
* Chris Howells schrieb am 10.09.07 um 16:47 Uhr:
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> > I'd suggest to do some tests with Bacula, and after you found your
> > best settings, clearly mark all tapes with their respective block sizes.
>
> Will do.
>
> Are you basically suggesting
On 10 Sep 2007 at 11:05, DAve wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
> >
> > Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
> > missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
> > h
On 10 Sep 2007 at 10:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
>
> > My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
> > about this bug.
>
> Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
> list announcment.
Done,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
>
> Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
> missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
> have a fairly extensive regression test suite that
> Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in the
> Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons (or the
> Director).
>
Should the patch fix the "auto-restore" of previous backups too or is it
still necessary to restore this data manuall
thx for the -f hint. it looks like an endless loop...
[pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
[pid 21593] select(6, NULL, [5], [5], {10, 0}) = 1 (left {10, 0})
[pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
[pid
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:27, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> > My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the
> > website about this bug.
>
> Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
> list announcment.
We
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
> I'd suggest to do some tests with Bacula, and after you found your
> best settings, clearly mark all tapes with their respective block sizes.
Will do.
Are you basically suggesting that I should use the following sd directives:
Minimum Block Size =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless there
>>> is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not
Hi,
10.09.2007 16:21,, Chris Howells wrote::
> Hi,
>
> I am currently struggling to get any kind of reasonable performance out
> of Bacula on my LTO 4 tape size. I have done a considerable of testing
> and benchmarking, and my hunch is that bacula's block size of 64512
> bytes is causing the p
Michael Patzer wrote:
> what does this damn process do? even with strace i couldn't see
> anything.
What exactly do you see when you strace it? Note that you'll need to use
strace -f to see what all of the threads are doing.
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a sol
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
> about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire: h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
> Kern,
>
> On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
>>> jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
>> Please re-read item 1 of my a
Hi,
I am currently struggling to get any kind of reasonable performance out
of Bacula on my LTO 4 tape size. I have done a considerable of testing
and benchmarking, and my hunch is that bacula's block size of 64512
bytes is causing the performance problems.
To test the drive, I used tar, with
This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that explicitly tests for this
kin
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:17:17 -0500, Kelly, Brian said:
>
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the advice. I have an additional file in my /etc/env.d directory
> that contains the PYTHONPATH. I've run env-update and source /etc/profile.
> My profile.env, ld.so.conf and ld.so.cache files are up to date.
i've now updated to 2.2.3 but the bug still exists.
does nobody besides me run bacula-dir 2.2.x with tls enabled?
lxmipa:/tmp/bacula-2.2.3# src/dird/bacula-dir -c
/etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf -v -f -d99 -s
bacula-dir: dird.c:156 Debug level = 99
bacula-dir: mysql.c:164 mysql_init done
bacula-dir:
Hello,
I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.
-
Hello,
I have posted the following pre-release files to www.bacula.org/downloads:
2.2.0-restore.patch
2.2.1-restore.patch
2.2.2-restore.patch
bacula-2.2.3.tar.gz
bacula-2.2.3.tar.gz.sig
winbacula-2.2.3.exe
winbacula-2.2.3.exe.sig
The web site does not permit directory listings of that directory,
Hi,
10.09.2007 09:32,, Christoff van Zyl wrote::
...
> My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
> about this bug.
I think Kern's working on it.
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de
---
Hi,
10.09.2007 05:12,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
> Hello,
>
> In Chapter 6.3.4 of the Bacula User's Guide, with regard to naming
> resources, the Guide states that:
>
> Each of your Bacula components must have a unique name.
>
>
> This is especially necessary when backing up a fleet machines.
Hi,
10.09.2007 02:23,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> Arno,
>
> On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
>> ...
>>
>>> On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
>>> answer.
>>>
>>> Documentation states
On Monday 10 September 2007 08:35, James Harper wrote:
> > I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch
>
> without
>
> > having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not
>
> what I
>
> > consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not
>
> "official
On Sunday 09 September 2007 23:46:24 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
>
> Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
> missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because w
55 matches
Mail list logo
