Re: [Bacula-users] Migrating to Bacula

--On Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 13:37 +0100 Rudolf Cejka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> With technology like LTO-3, perhaps it is time >> to consider giving the user the ability to turn >> off the CRC32 generation and comparison. Agreed. LTO verifies the written data on the fly. No need for veri

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

> P.S: Sorry, I do not want to be unfriendly, but would you mind turning HTML > messages off when posting to the list, if possible? > I am using gmail and I believe there is no global way to do that however I believe it sends both text and html in the same message. Am I wrong? This message I click

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

On 12/6/06, Heitor Medrado de Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, Bacula won't change from the first drive to the second, when the first volume gets full?? This is correct bacula does not support that feature yet. John

Re: [Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

--On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 19:13 +0100 Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case anyone on this list doesn't understand the difference between > backup programs and disk imaging programs (such as Acronis), backup > programs backup file by file. They can restore a full system to

Re: [Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kern Sibbald wrote: >> >> >> I don't know it and website only has the usual marketing blabla. Why would >> you want to use a disk imaging software for backups? > > I agree. It could be nice for mak

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

So, Bacula won't change from the first drive to the second, when the first volume gets full?? Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Heitor Medrado de Faria wrote: > >> Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the >> word unkinown is printed. Fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Heitor Medrado de Faria wrote: > > Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the > word unkinown is printed. For a restore, it doesn't care what pool is > involved. > > > But how can I do my backups, if bacula dont recognize the vol

Re: [Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

In case anyone on this list doesn't understand the difference between backup programs and disk imaging programs (such as Acronis), backup programs backup file by file. They can restore a full system to the bit level, but the bits may be in slightly different places on the disk. A disk image sy

Re: [Bacula-users] Restorejob bigger than space on originalserver (no delete record) - possible workaround but...

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Georg Altmann wrote: > Um, I think Alan meant the thread "Incremental backup, not accurate?" > You can find it here: > http://gmane.org/ > > also currently project no. 3: > Yes. Note that projects 3 and 10 are quite closely related in

Re: [Bacula-users] Retension of diskbased volumes

--On Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 16:17 +0100 Marcus Hallberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I just wants to see if I have understood this correctly... I am backing > up to disk and I want to configure my retention times correctly. > > What I do is to take one fullbackup every 3 months and da

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

Autochanger "loaded drive 0", result is Slot 1. 06-Dez 14:48 serpro-sdr-r00-sd: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 1, drive 0" command. 06-Dez 14:48 serpro-sdr-r00-sd: 3995 Bad autochanger "unload slot 2, drive 0": ERR=Child exited with code 6. 06-Dez 14:48 serpro-sdr-r00-sd: Please mount Vol

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

Second, I think you got the wrong idea of the autochanger resource. You want bacula to continue the job on another drive. This is not the way autochangers work (not in bacula at least). Bacula expects the next volume in the _same_ drive. AFAIK there is currently no way to tell bacula to continue

Re: [Bacula-users] Restorejob bigger than space on originalserver (no delete record) - possible workaround but...

--On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 09:42 +0100 User100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Alan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. Dezember 2006 13:42 >> An: User100 >> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users]

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

First, I think your mail-client is quoting incorrectly which is very confusing. Please consider fxing this. --On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 13:59 -0300 Heitor Medrado de Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the > word unkinown i

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

On 12/6/06, Heitor Medrado de Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the word unkinown is printed. For a restore, it doesn't care what pool is involved. > But how can I do my backups, if bacula dont recognize the volume pool? >> So

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the word unkinown is printed. For a restore, it doesn't care what pool is involved. > But how can I do my backups, if bacula dont recognize the volume pool? >> Sorry, Kern. The problem is not in fact the unknown pool. What i

Re: [Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

--On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 09:59 -0600 "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a customer interested in using Acronis True Image Server instead > of Bacula. Some reason were the Acronis bare metal restore and that the > Acronis Linux boot CD supports several raid drivers. I

Re: [Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I have a customer interested in using Acronis True Image Server instead of [...] > I have never heard of Acronis before. > > Anyone here use it before? How does it compare with Bacula? I've used Acronis True Image on Windows,

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

I have seen this many times with my changer but it does not cause any problems. One sure way to get this to happen is to restart the sd. Is this causing you a problem? What version of bacula are you using? Do you have a barcode reader? > I've already restarted my SD, but the problem remains.

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the word unkinown is printed. For a restore, it doesn't care what pool is involved. But how can I do my backups, if bacula dont recognize the volume pool? Heitor Faria Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:14

[Bacula-users] Acronis True Image server?

I have a customer interested in using Acronis True Image Server instead of Bacula. Some reason were the Acronis bare metal restore and that the Acronis Linux boot CD supports several raid drivers. The website is at http://www.acronis.com/enterprise/products/ATISLin/ I don't know the pricing nor

[Bacula-users] list nextvol

Hello, one question the command list nextvol job=NAME works fine for me with bconsle version Version: 1.36.3 (22 April 2005) but in version: Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) the nextvol job=NAME command shows the same output as list job=NAME and additional a line with the nextvol infor

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:14, Heitor Medrado de Faria wrote: > > Hi Folks! > > I having the following error: Well, I am sorry but I don't see any error. It isn't an error if the word unkinown is printed. For a restore, it doesn't care what pool is involved. > > Device "Drive-1" (/dev

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

I have seen this many times with my changer but it does not cause any problems. One sure way to get this to happen is to restart the sd. Is this causing you a problem? What version of bacula are you using? Do you have a barcode reader? I meant to say restart the sd with tapes in the drives. J

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

On 12/6/06, Heitor Medrado de Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Folks! I having the following error: Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0) is mounted with Volume="D03-SDR-REG-V01-06.06" Pool="*unknown*" <<< Pool Unknown??>> Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0. Total Bytes Read=129,024 Blocks Read=2

[Bacula-users] Autochanger Multitape Drives - Unknown Pool

Hi Folks! I having the following error: Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0) is mounted with Volume="D03-SDR-REG-V01-06.06" Pool="*unknown*" <<< Pool Unknown??>> Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0. Total Bytes Read=129,024 Blocks Read=2 Bytes/block=64,512 Positioned at File=0 Block=0 I using thre

Re: [Bacula-users] In Use Volume status not correct

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Kern Sibbald > Sent: 06 December 2006 08:50 > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Ian Levesque > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] In Use Volume status not correct > > On Wednesday 06 December

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-rescue problem : static-bacula-fd Segmentation fault when authenticating

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:27, 孙海成 wrote: > Hi,all > when I'm working on get bacula-rescue run in my redhat 8.0. when i compile bacula-1.36.3 source with configurat > ion in the documentation at http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Disast_Recove_Using_Bacula.html#SECTION0004140 > 00

Re: [Bacula-users] In Use Volume status not correct

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:29, Ian Levesque wrote: > Does anybody have any ideas? Even a "me too" would help at this > point, if only to determine if a common configuration issue can be > narrowed down... > > On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Ian Levesque wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > After

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Debian repackaging

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 08:46, Michel Meyers wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Friday 01 December 2006 11:56, Benoit Callebaut wrote: > >> I need a more recent Bacula Debian package( autoloader automatic volume > >> change bug fix). > >> I haven't found one more recent than (1.38.11). > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Restorejob bigger than space on originalserver (no delete record) - possible workaround but...

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Alan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. Dezember 2006 13:42 > An: User100 > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Restorejob bigger than space on > originalserver (no delete record) - possible workaro