Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Monday 04 December 2006 05:22, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > >> > >> These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new > >> blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing > >> remaining issues there. > > > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: btape: btape.c:2576 is an illegal command

On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:53, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > Kern, > > thanks for taking the time to help me. > > * Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am totally new to backups, backup hardware and bacula in special, but I > > > am not a newbie with computers in general. > > > > > > Fo

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing remaining issues there. OK, thanks. I've committed rewrite of the block-preserving encryption restoration

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: btape: btape.c:2576 is an illegal command

Kern, thanks for taking the time to help me. * Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am totally new to backups, backup hardware and bacula in special, but I > > am not a newbie with computers in general. > > > > Following the tutorial > >

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote: On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote: Signature validation is done on what is actually written to disk (upon restore).

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On 3 Dec 2006 at 16:26, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > As most of you know Bacula release version 1.40 is nearing -- it was > originally scheduled for mid-November but delayed due to my vacation and > several bugs. > > I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks like on

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote: > >> > >> > >> It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release; > >> what are the remaining blockers that yo

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote: It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release; what are the remaining blockers that you are concerned about? Well, for example, the digest/signature routines were p

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks > > like one major > > new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The > > code just > > is not s

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:23, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which > > means that > > if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I > > found this > > morning)

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks > > like one major > > new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The > > code just > > is not s

Re: [Bacula-users] Res: Bacula status

Hello, Thanks for your comments. I would only add that not only does 1.40 have "several" ..., but it has a *lot* of new and important features. Data encryption was actually voted #1 priority in the last round of voting (Nov 2005 if I remember correctly), so it is very important, and I am comm

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which means that if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I found this morning) If you're referring to digesting/signing sparse blocks (the change you comm

[Bacula-users] Res: Bacula status

Hi Kern, There are several attractive and useful features in 1.40 - native Win32 dir/sd, improved Win32 client, and job migration come to mind - that would be beneficial to many users. Data encryption, in my opinion, is not as critical as the other new features. I agree that writing encrypted da

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks like one major new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The code just is not stable (it doesn't pass a simple regression test), and it affects the Volume da

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: btape: btape.c:2576 is an illegal command

On Sunday 03 December 2006 17:50, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am totally new to backups, backup hardware and bacula in special, but I am > not a newbie with computers in general. > > Following the tutorial >

[Bacula-users] Error: btape: btape.c:2576 is an illegal command

Hello everybody, I am totally new to backups, backup hardware and bacula in special, but I am not a newbie with computers in general. Following the tutorial the program btape hangs on the following error: "btape: btape.c:2576

[Bacula-users] Bacula status

Hello, As most of you know Bacula release version 1.40 is nearing -- it was originally scheduled for mid-November but delayed due to my vacation and several bugs. I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks like one major new feature will not be enabled, and that is data

Re: [Bacula-users] How to understand this error

On 12/3/06, Arnaud Mombrial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Here is the output of my monthly backup. 03-Dec 01:00 Storage: server-compta-archive.2006-12-03_01.00.00 Error: block.c:940 Read error at file:blk 0:0 on device "Sony SDZ-100" (/dev/st0). ERR=Input/output error. Does anybody unders

[Bacula-users] How to understand this error

Hello, Here is the output of my monthly backup. 03-Dec 01:00 Storage: server-compta-archive.2006-12-03_01.00.00 Error: block.c:940 Read error at file:blk 0:0 on device "Sony SDZ-100" (/dev/st0). ERR=Input/output error. Does anybody understood what's the problem with this Backup Device named S

Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=Connection refused

Thanks Arno, It is working now. I mean, I go further in the process... even if I get a new error message. I am trying to deal with it by myself. My understanding level of network interfaces is obviously low because I was pretty sure the client knew its own IP address on the network and only had t