Hi,
I have recently been able to test bacula in a
tapeless configuration. From my tests I
understand that the device listed below
corresponds to a single file.
Device {
Name = CaliStorage
ArchiveDevice = /home/storage/
MediaType = File
RemovableMedia = No
RandomAccess = Yes
L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This's my first email to the list.
>
> Is Bacula able to use an external mySQL database?
It is, try reading up the catalog in the manual, it should be pretty
forward to set up (once you've adapted the database crea
Hi,
This's my first email to the list.
Is Bacula able to use an external mySQL database?
Thanks
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated te
In the message dated: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:14:05 +0200,
Kern Sibbald used the subject line
and wrote:
=> Hello Arno,
=>
=> Nice work. Your screen shots look really nice. It think this will be a
=> popular feature. My comments are below:
Yes, I like the look. I've been waiting unti
On Monday 10 July 2006 19:03, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:09:02 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Well Martin turned out to be right. The order of the code in the
> > previous patch that I send did not at all work on Linux. I still think
> > this must be Lin
Hi,
I have experienced problem with losing volume labels on tapes. This
happened after power cycle tape library and some other times. Every
time, I had to wipe out the tapes to relabel them. Is there a way to
just restore volume label to a tape without affecting data on the tape?
I am using Bacul
Arno,
I like it! That's pretty close to what I wanted.
Suggestions:
In the location definition screen, add a column for "Next Location", so
that one can specify what location is used next.
On the volume display screen, add a check box to select particular
volumes, and a "Move to Next Locati
Martin Simmons wrote:
>>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:09:02 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Well Martin turned out to be right. The order of the code in the previous
>>patch that I send did not at all work on Linux. I still think this must be
>>Linux bug, but I also don't think that Linu
Mine works fine.
ZK
--- James Cort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know the release notes for 1.38 say "upgrade
> everything", but I
> thought I'd ask on the off-chance.
>
> Has anyone successfully used a 1.36 FD in
> conjunction with a 1.38.9
> SD/director? My own limited testing sug
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:09:02 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> Hello,
>
> Well Martin turned out to be right. The order of the code in the previous
> patch that I send did not at all work on Linux. I still think this must be
> Linux bug, but I also don't think that Linus is going to agree :-
On 7/7/06, BillieGDJoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi,I'm testing Bacula, so I done backup of my Windows2k3 Server and all works fine. When I try to restore some files/directories that I delete for tests purposes and I know that was in backup, I get this error:
07-Jul 15:47 webwin3-fd: webwin3-rest
On 7/7/06, BillieGDJoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,I'm testing Bacula, so I done backup of my Windows2k3 Server and all works fine. When I try to restore some files/directories that I delete for tests purposes and I know that was in backup, I get this error:
07-Jul 15:47 webwin3-fd: webwin3-resto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, and you will run into trouble fairly quickly. My advice -- don't
mess around in that fashion.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 9
Hi,
I know the release notes for 1.38 say "upgrade everything", but I
thought I'd ask on the off-chance.
Has anyone successfully used a 1.36 FD in conjunction with a 1.38.9
SD/director? My own limited testing suggests that it works OK, but I
was wondering if anyone else has tried the same.
Jam
Ok. But thanks for your time all the
same!
Best Regards,
Christoff Buch
"user100" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 10.07.2006 16:10:37:
> Sorry forget it: "Fatal error: job.c: 1617 Bad response to Append
Data
> command. Wanted 3000 OK data" - does not seems like the "permission-bug"
> here.
>
>
Found it
http://bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_Consol_Restor_Comman.html#SECTION000218000
Forgot this message ...
Julien Cigar wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Another strange error I have today ... I did a :
> *umount tape-st
> $> tapeinfo -f /dev/st0
> $> mt -f /dev/st0 status
>
> Then when
Hello !
Another strange error I have today ... I did a :
*umount tape-st
$> tapeinfo -f /dev/st0
$> mt -f /dev/st0 status
Then when I issue a mount command in the bconsole to remount the drive I
get the following :
*mount
The defined Storage resources are:
1: tape-st
2: disk-st
Select
I run a job mannualy, and get the following error:
10-Jul 10:14 bacula-sd: MidasJob.2006-07-10_10.02.11 Error: Unable to
position to end of data on device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0): ERR=dev.c:839
ioctl MTEOM error on "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
10-Jul 10:14 bacula-sd: Marking Vol
Hi,
In the /etc/init.d I have the bacula start-script wich controls all daemons.
This script starts my sd via bacula-ctl-sd which is
in the scripts directory.
In the bacula-ctl-sd SD_USER and SD_GROUP are empty,
since I didn't
use the respective configure options.
So it runs as root, right?
Wha
Title: Nachricht
Hello,
Maybe
it´s the permission-bug - (are you using a restricted User for SD_USER in
/etc/init.d/bacula-sd?).
Greetings,
user100
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Christoff BuchGesendet: Monta
Hello everyone!
I have a problem with the behaviour
of my bacula-dir, resulting in failures as you can see below.
Please, does somebody know what the
reason is and how to correct it?
My system:
- bacula 1.38.9 (from source)
- mtx 1.2.18rel (from rpm)
- SuSE 9.0 Kernel 2.4.21-99
- Exabyte 221L Tap
On Monday 10 July 2006 11:08, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> Kern, is there any compelling reason for not making wait_for_drive the
> >> default?
> >
> > The problem is that it is "system" dependent, and so on some systems
> > would likely cause it to go into an in
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Kern, is there any compelling reason for not making wait_for_drive the
>> default?
>
> The problem is that it is "system" dependent, and so on some systems would
> likely cause it to go into an infinite loop. If someone really wanted to
> work on it, and
Hello Again
Thank you for your advice. When I used your script to determine if
remote host is up or down all previous problems was disappear.
But unhappily it happens once again and now I can see when it happens.
If scheduled job started and remote client brake communication (pull utp
cable or
24 matches
Mail list logo
