On Wednesday 14 June 2006 23:12, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 June 2006 22:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've been trying to compile 1.38.10 for my new test system. However,
> > this doesn't build on this arch. I tried originally with the HP-UX AnsiC
> > compilers and
Along this same line (security), I mentioned Verify jobs. For those of you
who don't know what I mean, here is an example of a Verify output where I
updated my development machine MySQL, CUPS, ... and the kernel, and I forgot
to run a new InitCatalog job to update the Bacula database with the n
>The answer seems pretty obvious - install the gcc suite. Its kinda hard
>to properly compile things on a system without these. Regardless of
>being installed from the same CD you neglected to install a very
>important set of tools.
>
>Sean
In my haste, I neglected to mention that I installed the
Sean,
although, she(?) is working with gentoo as the main (director) server, he is
trying to set up a "fedora core 3" client.
Kessia Pinheiro wrote:
> when i try install in my clients (other server with Fedora
>Core 3), how i dont find rpm's for Fedora Core 3, i try install for
>package
Sean,
although, she(?) is working with gentoo as the main (director) server, he is
trying to set up a "fedora core 3" client.
Kessia Pinheiro wrote:
> when i try install in my clients (other server with Fedora
>Core 3), how i dont find rpm's for Fedora Core 3, i try install for
>package
We've got the LTO3 option for the Quantum Superloader.. Had a problem with
the picker jamming the tapes.. After a two hour tech support call, they
agreed to send a replacement.
The other problem was related to the scsi card.. Can't use anything that has
RAID in the name (eg 29320) as the tra
Dan's right the subject is somewhat misleading.
I'm not a big fan of Gentoo as it package system can be somewhat painful
and requires enormous amounts of time for updates. The confusing issue
here is you say your using Gentoo but installing a Fedora Core 4 rpm
package. If your using Gentoo I'm
Richard,
The answer seems pretty obvious - install the gcc suite. Its kinda hard
to properly compile things on a system without these. Regardless of
being installed from the same CD you neglected to install a very
important set of tools.
Sean
Richard White wrote:
> This exercise relates to a
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 22:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to compile 1.38.10 for my new test system. However,
> this doesn't build on this arch. I tried originally with the HP-UX AnsiC
> compilers and received some obvious incompatibility related errors, but
> using
This exercise relates to a requirement that I be able to install a working
Bacula on a computer in the event that our production Bacula server failed. The
test was a success, but with some qualifications.
In the first place, our working Bacula server is on Red Hat. Since we are a
Novell shop, m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I've been trying to compile 1.38.10 for my new test system. However,
this doesn't build on this arch. I tried originally with the HP-UX AnsiC
compilers and received some obvious incompatibility related errors, but
using gcc/g++, I got the f
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:56, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:21:49 +0200, Steen said:
> >
> > My server is 1.38.0.
> > This one client is Mandriva 2006 and FD is 1.38.5 running as Root.
> > Every day I get theese errors, all are files in /etc or subdirs.
> > other files in
Dave wrote:
> Hi,
>Can you tell me more about your config? It sounds like what i'm
> trying to do. I've got multiple machines, some local, one not, that i
> want to back up to disk. I want to use the same information you did,
> but it seems as if i need a separate set of three pool definitio
Hi,
On 6/14/2006 2:58 PM, Kessia Pinheiro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -ivh bacula-client-1.38.8-1.FC4.i386.rpm
^^^
> aviso: bacula-client-1.38.8-1.FC4.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
> key ID 10a792ad
> erro: Failed d
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:21:49 +0200, Steen said:
>
> My server is 1.38.0.
> This one client is Mandriva 2006 and FD is 1.38.5 running as Root.
> Every day I get theese errors, all are files in /etc or subdirs.
> other files in /etc with same permissions get backed up fine.
> I don't understa
Kel Raywood wrote:
> I think that the phrase "well, it's not rocket-science" should be
> replaced with "well, it's not M theory". To the question, "What's M
> theory?" an appropriate response is "Exactly !".
Or "Bloody confusing".
My favourite physics quip is probably still "nobody understand
Thanks Ben, I will try your suggestion.
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/bacula-TLS-t1785382.html#a4868833
Sent from the Bacula - Users forum at Nabble.com.
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> ... It is now necessary to be a rocket scientist before even
> considering using the GNU C++ compiler :-(
Rocket scientists are notoriously bad programmers so I don't think that
this is some to aspire to. They crashed a Mars polar-lander because
they
Hi,
FC3 doenst have libcrypto.so.5 or libssl.so.5.
It does have libcrypto.so.4 or libssl.so.4.
One way is to rebuild the rpm client from the src.rpm. You might need to
install several *-devel packages (use "yum packageYouNeed"):
1) get the package
wget
http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourcefo
On 14 Jun 2006 at 11:42, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Nicholas Accad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been using bacula for some time now, and I am having an ..
> > um.. interesting situation. I am currently using 1.38.9, compiled
> > from source on a Debian/Sarge machine.
In response to Nicholas Accad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using bacula for some time now, and I am having an .. um..
> interesting situation.
> I am currently using 1.38.9, compiled from source on a Debian/Sarge
> machine.
>
> I have ~50 clients, each client has its own job, so
Hello,
I have been using bacula for some time now, and I am having an .. um..
interesting situation.
I am currently using 1.38.9, compiled from source on a Debian/Sarge
machine.
I have ~50 clients, each client has its own job, so 50+ jobs.
If I set the Volume Use Duration to anything other than
David,
When I created a package from the Bacula RH SRPMS, I noticed TLS support was
disabled, even though in the RPM spec file you'll see the option:
--with-openssl
If you read the Bacula docs, it says this option can be used as:
--with-openssl=
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Installing_Bac
On 14 Jun 2006 at 9:58, Kessia Pinheiro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm installing Bacula in a Gentoo server with a DAT-72 device. It's
> ok, but, when i try install in my clients (other server with Fedora
> Core 3), how i dont find rpm's for Fedora Core 3, i try install for
> package for Fedora Co
On 14 Jun 2006 at 3:34, David Rodriguez Demelos wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have installed all my bacula system (director, storage, clients,
> consoles, ...) by means of rpm or debian packages. Specifically, my
> director version is 1.38.9 and it is installed in red hat system. But,
> the problem is that
Hi everyone,
I'm installing Bacula in a Gentoo server with a DAT-72 device. It's
ok, but, when i try install in my clients (other server with Fedora
Core 3), how i dont find rpm's for Fedora Core 3, i try install for
package for Fedora Core 4, but the instalation ocorred a errors:
[EMAIL PROTECT
Steen wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2006 17:22, Jeff Dickens wrote:
>
>> It would be nice if there were ClientDefs, StorageDefs, PoolDefs,
>> analagous to the JobDefs which creates sets of defaults for Jobs,
>>
>> I'm setting up Bacula to do disk-based backups for 20-30 Windows
>> Clients, and thi
Hi,
On 6/12/2006 4:33 PM, Cassiano Pilipavicius wrote:
>
> Independent of the reasons, anybody knows if there''s a way to continue
> a job after a reboot of the bacula server.
>
> I know that in some other backup systems (like arkeia) i can do it. Its
> possible to do it with bacula?
No.
Ke
Hi,
I have installed all my bacula system (director, storage, clients, consoles,
...) by means of rpm or debian packages. Specifically, my director version
is 1.38.9 and it is installed in red hat system.
But, the problem is that I want use TLS comunications and I think that
installing bacula with
Rpm packages for 1.38.10 have been released to sourceforge.
Bacula-gui-13.8 Release Notes
12 June 2006
D. Scott Barninger
This release includes bacula-gui-bimagemgr only. There is no change to
bacula-gui-web since 1.38.9.
Configuration information has been separated out of bimagemgr.pl into a
Independent of the reasons, anybody knows if
there''s a way to continue a job after a reboot of the bacula
server.
I know that in some other backup systems (like
arkeia) i can do it. Its possible to do it with bacula?
Thanks!
___
Bacula-users ma
My server is 1.38.0.
This one client is Mandriva 2006 and FD is 1.38.5 running as Root.
Every day I get theese errors, all are files in /etc or subdirs.
other files in /etc with same permissions get backed up fine.
I don't understand what is happening - any clues anybody?
13-Jun 01:05 notap01-fd:
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 17:22, Jeff Dickens wrote:
> It would be nice if there were ClientDefs, StorageDefs, PoolDefs,
> analagous to the JobDefs which creates sets of defaults for Jobs,
>
> I'm setting up Bacula to do disk-based backups for 20-30 Windows
> Clients, and this requires adding somethi
Thanks for the ideas. I have sent an email to the FSF Europe to see if they
can help, and will take a closer look at the Center for Association
Leadership site.
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 17:13, Josh Fisher wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 23:54, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am thinking about what tape loader to buy, so I would like to have as
> much feedback as possible about your experience regarding reliability
> and service quality.
>
> My favorite would be LTO2 oder LTO3 with 8
This is almost certainly not the same as the problem you are having, but
I recently had an issue on a Windows server with Seagate Backup Exec,
and a 100/200gb LTO drive was reporting tapes as being full after
backing up about 74gb (before compression) of data.
Rebooted the server and drive, and no
> Fedora FC5 warning !!
> I have recently upgraded a number of my machines (fortunately not my
web
> server) to FC5, and I can say without reservation that it is the most
> unstable RedHat/Fedora system that I have ever seen. Among my
gripes:
D'oh. If only you had access to some
37 matches
Mail list logo
