What he REALLY wants is:
@/etc/bacula/client1/client.conf
...where this file contains Client { blah blah blah }
I'm not sure if you can do it the way that you've indicated, but I don't
see any reason you'd want to.
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:21:10 -0800, "mpapet" <[EMAIL PR
Hi,
have you changed anything on the pool resource since you have first used
"full_admt-0006"?
The volume retention is saved on a per volume basis in the database. If
you update the pool resource in the conf file the changes are not
updated on existing volumes.
check the volume retention with
Hi,
Running bacula 1.38.5 on SLES 9 we have following problem when running a
backup last night:
10-Mar 23:00 admt-sd: full_backup.2006-03-10_23.00.00 Warning: Director
wanted Volume "full_admt-0017".
Current Volume "full_admt_0006" not acceptable because:
1998 Volume "full_admt_0006" sta
On Saturday 11 March 2006 12:02, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of
> > >> three
> > >>
> > > >> tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't
> > > >> know why
The other thing, and I do this with MySQL, is that you can probably dump
the database or something like that. My expectation is that you have a
good reason for not doing that, but maybe not.
Frank Sweetser wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:12:58PM -0600, Jason Balicki wrote:
I have a clien
Hello,
Sorry for the double post..
It seems that I solved my problem by using the new "AutoChanger" configuration
way.
BTW, is there a build in transport encryption in bacula 1.38 ?
Regards,
Le Saturday 11 March 2006 14:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Bacula was working OK before my upgrade
On 11 Mar 2006 at 14:47, hikari wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> > volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>
> José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages up
> on the web somewhere. Though they d
Dan Langille wrote:
> The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages up
on the web somewhere. Though they didn't have TLS enabled when I
last looked (and he
On 11 Mar 2006 at 15:28, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Dan Langille schrieb:
> > The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> > volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
> >
> > I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
>
> It seems that a 1.38.5 package will be releas
Dan Langille schrieb:
> The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>
> I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
It seems that a 1.38.5 package will be released soon.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Bacula was working OK before my upgrade 1.36.3 -> 1.38.5.
The problem is that when I "update slots scan", I have the following actions :
(It even do not load each tape before telling that there is no volname.)
*update slots scan
Using default Catalog name=MyCatalog DB=bacula
The defined Storage r
The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
thanks
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
--
I want to use the next scheme -
I have 5 cassetes(or files on hard disk, as I think, it's the same)
I make a full backup every friday and incremental(or differential) on monday -
thursday. I have the following questions - how should I say bacula, that I
need to change volumes on 0:00 at the nig
Bacula was working perfectly before I upgraded from
app-backup/bacula-1.36.3-r1 to version 1.38.5.
I have a Sony tape changer (LIB-81) with 8 slots and an AIT3 drive.
My problem is that when I issure an "update slots scan", I have :
*update slots scan
Using default Catalog name=MyCatalog DB=bac
> > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >> I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of three
> > >> tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't
> > >> know why
> > >> volbytes/files show these values.
> > >>
> > >> Looking at the volume st
Hi all,
any hints what to do / how to handle messages like
"intervention needed - waiting to reserve a device"
- what should / can I do if I get this message and how I can prevent this ??
thx & rgds
Achim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
On Friday 10 March 2006 20:03, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 3/10/2006 4:03 PM, Erich Prinz wrote:
> > I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in
> > restoring the files, it never poses any problems.
> >
> > The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control freak
17 matches
Mail list logo
