On Saturday 11 March 2006 12:02, Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > > >> > > >> I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of > > >> three > > >> > > > >> tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't > > > >> know why > > > >> volbytes/files show these values. > > > >> > > > >> Looking at the volume state with llist, reports 1970-01-01 01:00:00 > > > >> as firstwritten date. > > > >> > > > >> mediaid: 5 > > > >> volumename: Bang5-2006-02-08 > > > >> slot: 5 > > > >> poolid: 1 > > > >> mediatype: AIT-2 > > > >> firstwritten: 1970-01-01 01:00:00 > > > >> lastwritten: 2006-02-19 01:41:36 > > > >> labeldate: 2006-02-18 19:30:03 > > > >> voljobs: 0 > > > >> volfiles: 0 > > > >> volblocks: 0 > > > >> volmounts: 1 > > > >> volbytes: 1 > > > >> volerrors: 0 > > > >> volwrites: 1,031,691 > > > >> volcapacitybytes: 0 > > > >> volstatus: Recycle > > > >> recycle: 1 > > > >> volretention: 777,600 > > > >> voluseduration: 172,800 > > > >> maxvoljobs: 0 > > > >> maxvolfiles: 0 > > > >> maxvolbytes: 0 > > > >> inchanger: 1 > > > >> endfile: 66 > > > >> endblock: 8,689 > > > >> volparts: 0 > > > >> labeltype: 0 > > > >> storageid: 2 > > > >> > > > >> There is one other tape used for a second client that reports this > > > >> date too. I checked the syslog entries, but couldn't find anything > > > >> obvious. The > > > >> time entries between 2006-02-18 and 2006-02-19 are all ok. > > > >> > > > >> Any ideas why bacula reports this wrong date? > > > > By the way, I don't see any problem here. The definition of the > > FirstWritten field is when the first data record is written not when the > > Volume is labelled, so just after labelling a Volume, this is normal. The > > LastWritten field is correct because it is updated each time the volume > > is written. > > But the first data record was written to that volume on 2006-02-18. > This volume is part of a set of three tapes (Bang4/5/6) that were used > for a full backup that started on 2006-02-18 19:30. The firstwritten > date of the volumes Bang4/6 are ok, they indicate the time when the > first data was written to that tapes. For volume Bang4 it's the time > the full backup startet, and for Bang6 it's the time when volume Bang5 > filled up and a volume was needed. bacula report this date > (1970-01-01) only for volume Bang5 and one other volume.
Evidently the volume was recycled and so the FirstWrite date was reset. If that is not the case, then the only thing I could imagine is that either your catalog is broken, which does not seem to be the case, or some program other than Bacula (i.e. a user?) modified something ... > > Ralf > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
