Hi,
Marcus wrote:
Ok. I thought the verify and fileset I'd set up was
supposed to verify by MD5 checksums, but I might have
messed that up.
Nonetheless, I deleted all files from the ../dlt
directory, ran the verify again, and it passed.
Could I be verifying against the verify or something
cra
> Verify checks that what was backed up matches what
> is on disk. The new file you added was not included
> in the backup, and therefore was not included in the
> verify.
Ok. I thought the verify and fileset I'd set up was
supposed to verify by MD5 checksums, but I might have
messed that up.
Hi all,
I'm using Bacula 1.36.3. I've been trying to set up fileset
exclusions for a number of Mac related files that start with a dot
(e.g. '.AppleDB' on Linux systems running netatalk; & '.DS_Store',
and files starting with '._' on a Windows system, that get left
behind after a Mac file
Marcus wrote:
> I've been playing with verifies and they seem to pass
> when they should fail.
...
> I simply put a text file in /video/dlt, backed it up,
> changed the test and verified. It passed the verify,
> it also passed when I added another file to ../dlt.
> What am I doing wrong?
Nothing.
I've been playing with verifies and they seem to pass
when they should fail.
Here are the two jobs I am doing:
Job {
Name = "Video to DLT-Archive"
Type = "Backup"
Level = "Full"
Client = bench-fd
Fileset = "Video-DLT"
Messages = Standard
Pool = Video-DLT4
Storage = FastStor1
}
Jo
> Concerning your recent problem, either use 1.37
> versions ... or check if you have "Use Any Volume =
> Yes" in your pool resource.
The pool I made up does have Use Any Volume set to
yes, it just acts like it isn't. Odd
> This is explained in detail in the manual.
>
> Arno
Thanks!
Hello,
Chris Lee wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcus
Sent: Saturday, 03 September, 2005 12:27
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Disable hardware compression / Running as root
I'm archiving a lot
Hello,
Marcus wrote:
Also, the drive and changer seem to do fine in the
btape tests. Already backed up and restore ~30g. I
think the problem is that I don't understand how
bacula likes rotating volumes and such.
Concerning your recent problem, either use 1.37 versions (not really
recommended
Hello,
I have just released the source for Bacula BETA version 1.37.38 to Source
Forge in tar format. Aside from a number of bug fixes to the 1.37.37 release
that you can see in detail in the ChangeLog, this release fixes both bug #402
in the bugs database and a more serious but similar bug.
Also, the drive and changer seem to do fine in the
btape tests. Already backed up and restore ~30g. I
think the problem is that I don't understand how
bacula likes rotating volumes and such.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from
I made up a test pool of volumes with my changer. Did some backups on the first
tape, then purged
it. For other backup tests, I mounted and used tape 2. I wanted to ditch tape
two and try stuff on
the third labelled/unused tape, but Bacula kept trying to append to two. Loaded
and mounted three
b
On Thursday 01 September 2005 14:25, Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I already contacted Kern about this and he suggested that i ask the
> lists about this.
>
> We want to backup all our clients to disk and then mirror these backups
> to tape. We want the ability to do quick restores from the
12 matches
Mail list logo
