Joerg Wunsch schrieb:
The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or less in a patch, if there
is no copyright assignment on file.
I thought with the recent changes, adding a new AVR device is merely
going to be a one-liner (a change to avr-devices.c)?
Yes, one line in GCC (not counting the regen
> -Original Message-
> From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
> [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:02 PM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subje
"Weddington, Eric" wrote:
> Gah, that last sentence should read: So, *those* files would have to
> be submitted to avr-libc *by Atmel*.
If they've already got a BSD-style copyright when they are shipping as
part of the Atmel toolchain (I didn't look whether they do), this
copyright statement its
"Weddington, Eric" wrote:
> Sure, it's now easier to add devices. But device support also needs
> the I/O header file in avr-libc, and no one else can submit that
> except Atmel.
I think anyone can submit it ;) (because it could be created even
based on the datasheet), but that doesn't matter mu
r-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Praveen, Vidya; Wunsch, Joerg; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
>
>
>
> > Weddington, Eric schrieb:
> > >> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> > >>
> > >>> The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:39 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Praveen, Vidya; Wunsch, Joerg
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
>
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or less in a patch, if
there is no copyright assignment on file.
I thought with the recent changes, adding a new AVR device is
merely going to be a one-liner (a change to avr-devices.c)?
Sure, it's now e
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brown [mailto:da...@westcontrol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:35 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: Porting Atmel patches
>
>
> Isn't it possible for a potential contributor to "give" the patch
> -Original Message-
> From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
> [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:58 AM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subje
>The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or less in a patch, if there
>is no copyright assignment on file.
I thought with the recent changes, adding a new AVR device is merely
going to be a one-liner (a change to avr-devices.c)?
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting
Atmel patches
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Notice you must have passed the paperwork.
Well, don't you think that adding support for a new AVR device
would consist a simple change that doesn't require the full
paperwork?
I think it's always a
> -Original Message-
> From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
> [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:17 AM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subje
@nongnu.org] on behalf of Joerg
Wunsch [j...@uriah.heep.sax.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:47 AM
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Notice you must have passed the paperwork.
Well, don't you think tha
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Notice you must have passed the paperwork.
Well, don't you think that adding support for a new AVR device would
consist a simple change that doesn't require the full paperwork?
I think it's always a good idea for a potential contributor to file
the paperwork, but for a
Adam Seychell wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have joined this list to get help with port 8bit AVR patches
> disributed with Atmel's AVR toolchain to the current official GCC, and
> binutils. As you may be aware, Atmel have separated development from the
> official gcc, binutils and avr-libc projects. I am new
> -Original Message-
> From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
> [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Adam Seychell
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 10:18 PM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Porting
16 matches
Mail list logo